Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/dragons-dogma-dark-arisen
Tl;dr: "im a massive fanboy of a average game"
So because I love the game when Metacritic has it at a score of 80...your point is? 80 on Metacritic is actually “Great” by the way, not average. LOL."
My point is that your review is extremely biased. I dont go around calling the games I like " triumph of art, technology, and game design" or "masterpieces" when there are a few others in the genre much better. If you cant separate your extreme bias from objectivity,then your reviews will never be good. Just ask IGN ;)
if you want a completely objective game review, it would be a spec sheet
They seem to think if Metacritic says it is an 80, that it is impossible for anyone to give it higher. Each of us are unique people. We all have our personal tastes! I thought Dragon's Dogma was dang near the tastiest morsel I've ever played! I have a right to my opinion, and I have a right to post it on this forum!
I agree with you (after all,reviews are also opinions),but not to this point. Someone calling a game with a few obvious flaws of a "masterpiece" is just...well,ridiculous.
Reviews like this are not analogous to a court of law where objective facts reign supreme. They are analogous to the court of public opinion, where opinions are everywhere and facts are hard to locate for inclusion in the deliberations. Some things are pretty undeniably flaws, like slowdowns. Most of them, however, are matters of opinion and taste.
2) one of the most critizised points of this game were the inumerous bugs and graphical glitches. So here you go.
But hey,you're saying a 10/10 review of a port still not launched is ok! Good for you!
You are engaging in the classic review score fallacy that 10 out of 10 means "perfect in every way." It does NOT mean this. Most sites make 10 out of 10 mean "Essential" or "Masterpiece".
Notice Gamespot's list of 10 out of 10[www.gamespot.com]. Every single one of those games has issues. Some of those have serious issues. That doesn't stop them from being "works of oustanding artistry, skill, or workmanship."
No one is ignoring the flaws. We are saying the game is so good that it is essential to play regardless. Read that Gamespot 10 out of 10 list. You are not understanding how review scores work.
Dragon's Dogma has issues...I list the main ones in my review because I'm not blind or delusional. However, Dragon's Dogma is, in my opinion, "a work of outstanding artistry, skill, or workmanship." A masterpiece!
Translation.
"Her der, no game can be good. All gaming is trash. Your to positive must be bs. Plus, I apparently stopped reading after the first line then complained becuase I didnt read about what I wanted to know... out of a huge post. So Im stupid."