Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Resistances-who cares? buy curatives
Defensive stats- buy curatives
Str/Mag bonuses- on lvl100(normal mode) and lvl150(hard mode) You should be able to melt 85% of the enemies in BBI so...
Don't think best needs to be defined, obviously im talking about stat-wise, what else would i be talking about.
Objectively speaking, the best pieces of level 3 BBI gear are the best piece of gear simply because they provides the highest and/or best combination of stat boosts. The weight of the stuff would only be a factor if it was inordinately heavy. It isn't, therefore whatever it's weight is a worthwhile trade off for the stat boosts it provides. Do you NEED level 3 BBI gear, or any BBI gear at all? No, but that's a whole different discussion.
"Best" for matching appearances" is a special case and never used to define a "best" piece of gear beyond exactly that - matching appearances. To you, the best looking piece might mean it's the best piece but that isn't how the overwhelming majority of people make that decision.
Some of the Tier 3 BBI Armor have far better enhancements than paltry stat gains. Think inherent health regeneration, extended buff duration, increased carry-weight and dragon wingflap immunity to name a few.
The main reason to use the bbi lvl3s is the random additional effects they can have, stuff like what Paradox mentioned.
Overall, outside of early-game (which I'm defining as pre-everfall opening), having super heavy armor isn't going to do anywhere near enough to really justify wearing some of the high end stuff that looks like crap. The enemies will still be hitting hard enough to cause major damage even with the armor, and you are better served learning how not to get hit in the first place than trying to soak damage. Even warrior and fighter can't actually soak hits in post game without heavy curative use until they are very much overleveled, and with BBI, you will never reach a point where you can really tank hits against any of the bbi exclusive monsters.
What is a fact is the extent of protection or some other advantage the gear provides and Paradox's examples are still stats, just like any other stat. These things are not opinions, the effects are measurable, as is their difference from piece to piece, and everybody can agree on their inherent value. That means they provide an objective basis to determine which piece of gear is better than another, eventually arriving at the best gear based on the highest or the best combination of stats. Why do we do it this way? So people will know WTF you're talking about in a "best gear" discussion.
This is why in EVERY single game that has weapons and armor the higher-tiered, hard to find, more expensive and generally more desirable gear always has stat advantages over lesser pieces, regardless of how subjectively better it might look.
I took that to mean he was asking if he needed to farm/use bbi armor to survive.
The whole purpose of bringing up fashion's dogma was to illustrate the fact that the majority of long term players don't actually worry about how protective the armor is, with more importance being placed on looks. Even the most protective gear isn't worth much in BBI.
This is in no way a best gear discussion. The op was not asking for best gear, he was asking if it is necessary to wear bbi gear over existing gear that has effects he likes.
You and a few others highjacked the thread trying to turn it into a best gear discussion.
You claim that looks are subjective? So is the importance of stats. You can kill everything in bbi nude and with rusted weapons if you wanted to. This means the stats of armors are of subjective value, based upon the player's opinions.
It then became a best gear discussion when huggles decided he wanted "best" defined, even though throughout the entire RPG genre "best" always has been, is currently, and forever will be defined by stats and Shurris was obviously using stats to make that determination.
As far as the subjectivity of stats goes, you're missing the point. Stats are used to define the quality (good, better, best) of gear because stats and the benefits they provide are something that everyone can agree on and understands, unlike fashion which is nothing but pure preference. Various opinions regarding the importance of those stats in a particular game doesn't make any difference, the criteria for determining what gear is the best gear remains the same else one could just as easily argue that the rags (literal rags in Dragon's Dogma) you start out with are the best gear in the game.
I will say this, though. I replied to your post before I'd gotten my caffeine ppm to the near toxic levels my body requires and in retrospect, it does seem mostly geared to answering the OP's original question, however, I think it's also a thinly-veiled defense of the notion that "best" or even "better" ever has anything to do with fashion or something other than stats. Maybe it is and maybe it isn't. Either is fine and I'm willing to not argue with you about it if you say it isn't.