Warrior vs Fighter pawn?

[Greywolf]

Wondering if I should turn my pawn into a fighter? Currently she is a warrior and kind of going for the barbaric vibe and a honking great club fits well in that regard but I am not sure warriors are all that useful as pawns, nor do they tend to get hired as much.

Do warriors have a use or is it best just to go fighter?

[Rosvo-Rolle lft 6s]

Warriors have lots of defences, poise, stagger power and attack power, but lacks shield. I have not used lots of Warriors on my team, nor played at it.

I prefer Fighter, because it can tank hits better than Warrior and has cool skills.

If you need tank on your team, I'd advice to switch off to Fighter, but having Warrior in your team alongside with Fighter is a good idea for juggernauting.

[_bDp^]

As a warrior tryhard, I would say steer clear of Warrior pawns unless you are playing Warrior yourself or you litterally don't give them any skills so they only use core. Warrior pawns can do a lot of work, especially against Gransys/Everfall bosses with knockdown/stun lock but Fighters 'scale' much better with Bestiary knowledge, have much higher consistent DPS with level 3 skills, and perform timed-blocks like champs making them potentially much better CC machines.

[capricorn1971ad3]

Originally posted by Greywolf:

Wondering if I should turn my pawn into a fighter? Currently she is a warrior and kind of going for the barbaric vibe and a honking great club fits well in that regard but I am not sure warriors are all that useful as pawns, nor do they tend to get hired as much.

Do warriors have a use or is it best just to go fighter?

This warrior pawn gets hired more than my fighter pawn actually.

I have 6 pawns, one of each vocation, my mage is rented the most, followed by my warrior, and then my sorcerer, and then my fighter, and then my strider and my ranger least of all.