Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Edit: exect wording: Trojan.Gen.NPE.2 (detected and removed)
Also, why are people still using Norton? It's worse than a lot of the spyware/adware/viruses that it tries to get rid of :|
Also, I love how they say the file risk is high, but yet on their website, they say "Risk Level 1: Very Low" and that it's a "generic detection" for which "specific definitions" have not been created.
If you're running Windows 10, I'd advise to not run a seperate virus scanner and leave it to the default windows defender. Sadly computers still come with all kinds of bad software that isn't needed.
Disclaimer: I'm not responsible for your viruses. (Though I guess norton does claim me to be a l33t hackz0r)
2005Guyver01:
Yes, thankfully it was detectred and removed before it could deploy its "command payload."
Koutetsusteel:
Our Norton detected this one as High risk. I agree that Norton is bloated software..But it worked, and that's what matters. Reason for still using Norton: it is free as part of our Internet service from Xfinity/Comcast. At least it worked.
Shriker:
While I partially agree that a normal *.ogg file is no threat, it could easily be a renamed file extension and actually be a disguised trojan virus, or trojan command payload, which is called out from a different piece of the trojan virus to wreak havoc. Any file extension can contain pieces of a virus and you would never suspect it. Please take a look at the recent virus types being deployed by the bad guys as ransomware, and you will see prime examples.
...........................................
The important point is, the Developer deployed an infected file to EVERYONE who owns this game, and they need to take imediate action to fix it.
Zun,
You sent out this file as part of a recent patch, and you are responsible; nobody else, period.
Microsoft has great OS and Dev tools, but the malware tools are a joke; Windows Defender is only a removal tool and not a very good one, it was never designed to act as a detection tool.
Heck, Microsoft themselves advises people to run a third party application for detecting and stopping virus activity, such as Kaspersky, Norton, etc. You telling folks to not run antivirus protection is outrageous in this age of ransomware and leaked virus creation tools... Wow... Seriously?
The game is great, otherwise I would not have spent 23 hours on it so far. However, there was a patch of your game through Steam which flagged as a virus right after the download completed... No other activity prompted the virus software, juyst the update to your game, that you created.
Wow! These are YOUR game files.. And YOU are blaming US for the virus from your updates? Are you insane?
You obviously received very low grades in brand recognition and marketing basics classes.
Insinuating, or implying that the end-user somehow caused the virus to happen from your update is very insulting.
-Bad move snowflake-
If you send out another virus laden file, you will be reported to Steam... over and over and over and over and over...
Get my point? Fix it - Don't blame us for what you sent out - Just fix it.
ramavich007,
Lol.. you are SO right; Norton is a bloated monster that is better suited as a bandaid, which is why I tested my system using Kaspersky and Trend Micro after the initial detection.
In all seriousness though. Stop being a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ moron, Grimothos. It's not an actual virus; it's a false positive.
You're going to feel really stupid after Symantec looks at the file and deems it as a false positive -_- Or at least more stupid than you should already feel. You're sitting here calling the dev a snowflake because he made a disclaimer... how much of an teenage edgelord are you? The disclaimer was in regards to his previous advice about using Windows Defender. He gave advice and then posted a disclaimer stating that if you use said advice, he isn't responsibile for any viruses incurred. Try to keep up, will you?
Yep. Had 3 years of I.T. and Network security classes and all we ever talked about when it came to Norton is how horrible it is. In many cases it is worse than the viruses it claims to protect against. There are often times where you have to download a third party program just to UNINSTALL Norton because it won't ever uninstall properly (it lingers on your system. you know, like a virus?)
I just ran a scan using an updated Kaspersky and it didn't find anything, so...
And I also ran Malwarebytes (which I trust wayyy more than Norton) and it didn't find anything either.
As I stated above, this is an obvious false positive, and I sent it over to norton for them to fix (because as I said, it is not me that causes the issue here). They have responded since and added the files' hash to their whitelist in the newest virus definitions.
False positives are the problem of the antivirus.
True positives in the context of this game would be my problem.
True positives in the context of illegal games or so would be the users problem.
The only case that is up for me to fix in the game files is the 2nd one.
The first is up to norton to fix - this time with me sending the file to them.
The end-user is responsible in the sense that they're using an antivirus product that has a high rate of false positives, and thus gets the false positives. Calling detecting a false positive to be the product 'working' is also slightly strange.
To say Windows Defender is "only a removal tool" and microsoft "recommends a proper antivirus" is a bit outdated as far as I know, I'd appreciate some recent reports and a recent quote from microsoft on that. It has substantially increased in scope since the windows 7 days. They are now making "Microsoft signature pc's & laptops" that do not have any 3rd party bloatware - including no 3rd party antivirus software. If people were very vulnerable that way they surely wouldn't release it that way.
By now Windows Defender also includes rootkit defending, realtime scanning, uploading false positives to the cloud for better analyzing etc.
But to come back to my advice of running only Windows Defender; The problem is a bit two-sided. If you are constantly downloading illegal porn & clicking on the ads these type of sites present or other shady things, you're going to catch a virus. Irrelevant of your antivirus. Whether you have a nagging McAfee or not. It's probably better still to have a more proper antivirus, which (in my opinion that hasn't touched the products) seems to be something like Kaspersky or Malwarebytes' antivirus. But you're catching a virus anyway.
If you are aware of what to click on and what not (i.e, aware of the shady download buttons etc), odds are you can do better with Windows Defender not breaking your applications & nagging you for updates / licenses etc.
The antivirus priority tree is basically these, with A) being optimal security/usability.
A) Malwarebytes / Kaspersky / various other reputable ones, paid.
B) Windows Defender / malwarebytes / kaspersky / some other reputable ones, free editions.
C) Norton, McAfee, tons of otheres, paid.
D) C) but free.
E) No antivirus at all.
Now in light of most peoples' pockets and willingness to pay, you're ending up at B). Of those things, the free editions will likely create popup ads to buy the full version, numbing the user to actual threats (it's a similar popup).
It's turning into a bit of a random rant, so I'll stop here for this post.