Tom Clancy's The Division

Tom Clancy's The Division

View Stats:
sorokor Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:39pm
Will The Division have zombies?
The title says all.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 174 comments
Pipuk Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:42pm 
yes, but they purchase the gold edition and will be on our side.
Neil Young Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:42pm 
Maybe. We don't know. We gotta play the game.
I'm sure the endgame story will be leaked eventually closer to the release.
It's possible they are leading up to zombies, but I kind of doubt it.
ThatGuy Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:43pm 
Originally posted by Pipuk:
yes, but they purchase the gold edition and will be on our side.

Don't listen to him he is a blantant liar. There will be no zombies in this game, however, there is a secrete location that will contain giant irradiated chickens.
Bard Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:46pm 
Yes I work at Ubisoft I can confirm this game will be renamed to DayZ Extended Edition in April 2016 and we will release a 40 € DLC which allows u to look like Rick Grimes
Last edited by Bard; Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:47pm
Galen Dragonay Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:49pm 
No. The answer is just simply no.
Last edited by Galen Dragonay; Dec 26, 2016 @ 2:14pm
eXic'>>ales<< Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:51pm 
why lot of ppl need have stupid zombies in every game? exist lot of games with zombies, look into store here :) division is no zombie game
Zeke Jan 24, 2016 @ 1:02pm 
No, While it's not well explained on the store page, the virus that causes widespread panic is Smallpox introduced into the US currency system on black friday.
Baiterade Jan 24, 2016 @ 1:20pm 
Originally posted by Ezikeyal:
No, While it's not well explained on the store page, the virus that causes widespread panic is Smallpox introduced into the US currency system on black friday.
Yeah. The virus kills people. It doesn't turn them into zombies.:steamfacepalm:
Zeke Jan 24, 2016 @ 1:20pm 
Originally posted by Voodooman:
Originally posted by Pipuk:
yes, but they purchase the gold edition and will be on our side.

ahaha, you nailed it. Actually anyone who buys this game is a zombie, blind and stupid. Its just generic cover shooter with now downgraded graphics and intrusive UI that has zero immersion and totally lacking realism. i dont even get why it has Tom Clancy's name in it. There is nothing Tom Clancy's about it. Except maybe that it has same boring cover shooting gameplay as every recent tom clancy game starting from R6 vegas.
It's totally not pulling fromt he highlights of many other tom clancy games at all!
The nice slow cover shooting mechanic of R6 Vegas, the customization options seen in many titles, the loot system found in many populer ARPGs and seemingly done quite well.
And it def does not have any aspect of a splinter cell game in it's methodical approach to many of the same combat situations allowing for replayability and varience in your group's composition.

Def not.
Fersure.
v00d00m4n Jan 24, 2016 @ 1:38pm 
Originally posted by Ezikeyal:
Originally posted by Voodooman:

ahaha, you nailed it. Actually anyone who buys this game is a zombie, blind and stupid. Its just generic cover shooter with now downgraded graphics and intrusive UI that has zero immersion and totally lacking realism. i dont even get why it has Tom Clancy's name in it. There is nothing Tom Clancy's about it. Except maybe that it has same boring cover shooting gameplay as every recent tom clancy game starting from R6 vegas.
It's totally not pulling fromt he highlights of many other tom clancy games at all!
The nice slow cover shooting mechanic of R6 Vegas, the customization options seen in many titles, the loot system found in many populer ARPGs and seemingly done quite well.
And it def does not have any aspect of a splinter cell game in it's methodical approach to many of the same combat situations allowing for replayability and varience in your group's composition.

Def not.
Fersure.

well that was obvious part, companies like ubi tend to keep base core mechanics in most of games but segregate them by adding and removing some details of mechanics which change game a little comparint to another, instead of making one game that does it all.

Division seems like the most lacking and most generic one of ubi cover shooters like a watch dogs with removed press x hacking and vechicles.
sorokor Jan 24, 2016 @ 1:39pm 
lmao
Zeke Jan 24, 2016 @ 2:03pm 
Originally posted by Voodooman:
Originally posted by Ezikeyal:
It's totally not pulling fromt he highlights of many other tom clancy games at all!
The nice slow cover shooting mechanic of R6 Vegas, the customization options seen in many titles, the loot system found in many populer ARPGs and seemingly done quite well.
And it def does not have any aspect of a splinter cell game in it's methodical approach to many of the same combat situations allowing for replayability and varience in your group's composition.

Def not.
Fersure.

well that was obvious part, companies like ubi tend to keep base core mechanics in most of games but segregate them by adding and removing some details of mechanics which change game a little comparint to another, instead of making one game that does it all.

Division seems like the most lacking and most generic one of ubi cover shooters like a watch dogs with removed press x hacking and vechicles.
Ubisoft montreal was the lead dev for watchdogs, you know, the team that kinda dropped the ball.
Ubisoft Massive is the one in charge of the Division so it's an entirely different publishing house, same publisher.
v00d00m4n Jan 24, 2016 @ 2:43pm 
My dear naive friend - all ubi games are made by all of their big studios together, named studi does a core job but still they are share same tech, same assets, same producers, same creative directors, same marketing division that pulls most of strings. So it does not important which studio of ubi makes a game - they are all merge together and share hell lot of common everything and release games with identical core mechanics. Plus there is a heavy rotation of people between studios - for example guy who started R6 Vegas and Conviction cover shooter trend in Ubi montreal moved to Ubi toronto and continued that with Blacklist and Far Cry 4, which despite developed in Toront was not really different from Montreal's Far Cry 3. The only 2 Ubi studios that more or less indy and do their own thing almost completely alon - Montpelier and RedLynx, one does all Rayman and Rabbidz anothe Trials. Rest of studios melter in collective ubisoft uncoutious. Oh there are also Shanghai and Kiev, first sometimes does quick sequels while bigger studios makes bigger sequels, but recently they mostly do help and porting job, and kiev totally does PC porting in recent years and does it pretty bad.
Last edited by v00d00m4n; Jan 24, 2016 @ 2:47pm
Zeke Jan 24, 2016 @ 2:52pm 
Oh you ARE a troll, Shame it took me a minute to learn that.
Very well, you may enjoy whatever games you wish.
v00d00m4n Jan 24, 2016 @ 2:58pm 
Originally posted by Ezikeyal:
Oh you ARE a troll, Shame it took me a minute to learn that.
Very well, you may enjoy whatever games you wish.

Man, you stupid. Im not troll, im just enlitening naive and ignorant people like you with truth they are not aware of.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 174 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 24, 2016 @ 12:39pm
Posts: 174