Angry Joe and Devildoggamer

[Ikira Conti]

So these guys are like the toughest of people when it comes to shooters and both endorse this game as a great shooter. What does that tell you. And don't say that they're paid when it came to Battlefront Devildog himself said it sucked so don't go on the money excuse cause it doesn't work

[JayOnSpeed]

Who is Joe and why is he angry? How the hell can a dog do videos and play video games?

[ha]

JayOnSpeed a écrit :

Who is Joe and why is he angry? How the hell can a dog do videos and play video games?

The Dog is a famous canine that started as common fast food peddler but then became e sports gamer that chases cats all other the internet.
Here is documentary about his humble beginnings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HVFF9TD0CI
Joe is "Average Joe" project of illuminaty ,advanced form of AI with angry algoritms. It is planning to take over the world thats why it specializes in shooters. In case it fails illuminaty have "Other Joe" AI that specializes in melee.

[PlayerNameT]

BuzzardBee a écrit :

Angry Joe seemed incredibly and uncharacteristically restrained in his vid playthrough. I wouldn't exactly call that a screaming endorsement.

Well you can't really scream around in a room full of other Youtubers/press people while playing at such an event and Joe obviously knows that. It was still pretty strange to see him that quite though.

His final thoughts at the end of the video however have been rather positive. While he voices some concerns there really isn't anything he points out to be a real problem. Of course thats only a first impression but it's a positive one nonetheless.

[Hendumaica]

One of our regular video game journalist here in France have stated after these 3 hours of playing:

"On pouvait légitimement craindre que le résultat ne soit pas à la hauteur des attentes tant The Division gagnait en discrétion à mesure que les mois s'écoulaient. Il n'en est finalement rien : Cette version n'atteint évidemment pas la qualité visuelle de la vidéo de présentation et semble encore parfois à la peine techniquement, mais elle propose une expérience particulièrement agréable à parcourir en coopération. New-York est reconstitué avec un réel sens du détail, bénéficiant notamment d'éclairages séduisants et d'effets de fumée et de vapeur soignés sans oublier d'être sublimée par une bande-son pêchue et immersive. Avec son loot accrocheur, son système de personnalisation copieux et une ambiance aussi soignée, The Division a toutes les cartes en main pour attirer les joueurs dans son escarcelle. Pour les retenir, il devra toutefois s'assurer de proposer un contenu digne de ce nom, un point sur lequel ont pêchés certains AAA connectés de ces dernières années. Réponse début Mars pour le lancement de la version finale du jeu."

Summing it up:

He had concernes for the division. After playing it he has more confidence. The graphics are lower than expected but both the lightingand smoke effects are great. The game has everything to be great. Now it'll come down to Ubisoft. Will they be able to put in it enough interesting content or not. But the base product as it is at beta date is fine, as far this french journalist is concerned.

[Noxcuse]

more money more hype from youtuber zombies

[Metsakurat]

SWATmember95 a écrit :

So these guys are like the toughest of people when it comes to shooters

I like Joe and i strongly disagree with you. Why are they the "toughest"? I wouldn't trust their opinions on a game more than a randoms bloke opinion.
Furthermore they're not even THAT good at games. When it comes to competitive i bet an average gamer could beat them in pretty much every genre.

Joe is funny tho. I give him that. I just wish he would make more of them angry reviews.

[Fuzzyballs01 ꦙ]

who gives a ♥♥♥♥ about Angry Joe
he's one of the most annoying reviewers out there, right behind Total Biscuit
why do you people even listen to reviews? I look at no commentary gameplay and make up my own mind

like, do you actually believe those people couldn't possibly be paid to endorse games?

[Terra Blade]

SWATmember95 a écrit :

So these guys are like the toughest of people when it comes to shooters and both endorse this game as a great shooter. What does that tell you. And don't say that they're paid when it came to Battlefront Devildog himself said it sucked so don't go on the money excuse cause it doesn't work

Ageryjoe also said Battlefield sucked in his review, it's the reason I didn't buy it. I tend to trust Joe since his standards and mine tend to agree. So in watching his video the other day I am definetly going for the game. It looked fun, and while Joe admits to bugs (it's still alpha) he said it overall was very fun to play.

Seems like I can play my balistic shield medic and enjoy it in just a month. Should be fun! :p

[Doranvel]

As much as I like angry joe... he is very biased and is easily tainted by his opinionated thoughts. I like to watch his show but I take his opinions with a grain of salt. I do however see many people saying this is fun so I want to see for myself.

[Terra Blade]

Fuzzyballs01 🐫 a écrit :

who gives a ♥♥♥♥ about Angry Joe
he's one of the most annoying reviewers out there, right behind Total Biscuit
why do you people even listen to reviews? I look at no commentary gameplay and make up my own mind

like, do you actually believe those people couldn't possibly be paid to endorse games?

Reviews give a highlight, with gamplay footage, and point out any grand flaws. I can point to an older game Damnation which is case in point. The reviews said it was bad because of many things it's control scheme. I picked the game up thinking I could handle a little bad controls, I just wanted to play some steampunk action. Last I checked I think I only lasted an hour before I gave up and moved on to another game.

Reviews should not be your only stick to measure by, I agree. But if you find a reviewer who tends to focus on things that matter to you, it helps you spend you money on games that will actually be fun. I prefer Joe since he doesn't seem to get bent out of shape over graphics (graphics do not make a good game alone), he is fun to watch for me, and going back on some of his older reviews to see his opinion vs mine we tended to agree on several points. Overall, means if he gets a preview look and likes it, and has video to back it up, I think I will like the game as well.

[Hendumaica]

Joe do alot of sponsored video but when he does so: He has the honest to say it out loud.

Joe canbe hyped? Good! In the end video games are GAMES and we're supposed to be excited bout them!

[I got 1984'd]

Angry Joe looked a bit disappointed and displeased. I guess he had high hype too, which could be the fault.

[Hendumaica]

Where i kinda like Joe's work is... he had strong hype and hope for the game.... While the game wasn't up to his expectations, he stills had the mind cool enough to say the game was good even if it wasn't great.

[Darugdawg]

The problem is neither released a review. Only game footages

[Panic Fire]

NOOB a écrit :

The problem is neither released a review. Only game footages

Because reviewers wern't sent review copies, they were told to play the game on release and review that.