Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/519385854236165844/433E2A1106AFAF09E1D9B98AC1833B3E1BCA20C6/
In later years (2000+), when OSes with all features (for the player company) take 2-4 years to develope the amount of new AI OSes that get released seems to decline.
Maybe they should adjust the amount of man hours that each feature requires for each decade ... with each feature requiring the most amount of man hours in the 80s and then declines from the 90s to the 2ks.
IMHO that would make sense, considering the fact that IDEs and programming languages (and their class/function libraries) have progressed a lot since the 80s,
with nowadays IDEs provisding an amount of features that help with programming, of which programmers within the 80s could only have dreamed. And also nowadays most of the data structures and functions that would have to be programmed by programmers in the 80s themselves, are nowadays contained within standard class/function libraries
10 day codeing and 20 days planing how to actually fit the code into that darn floppy.
Today we got 100GB of space and our programe will end up around 20-30GB of space.
30days of coding 10 days of rewriting codeblocks 2 days to fix an broken libary. 1 day of planing.
end pruduct 41GB of space and 2GB of code thats never called but the program will not work whit out it.
I'm well aware, but I think inclusiveness is more important than realism in this case.
Well said! I think, the issue in 80's and 90's was that the male dominated industry simply wasn't hiring female developers by choice, not that there weren't enough applicants. remember that the worlds first computer programmer was a woman. If you want to run your company by only hiring young men then you can choose to do that I guess, but, I like the ability to choose from the entire population.
As for OS's, Operating Systems date back to the late 1950's and there have been many of them. today we have Unix, Linux, Windows, Mac OS, and every single console and hand held device has its own proprietariy OS. In 2017 we are all so used to hearing about Windows and Mac OS because of their "Unavoidable" marketing campaigns, but, we don't talk about the other OS's that exist because many people just don't know about them. And that is the power of marketing and market share!
for me the issue is personal, its hard for me to wrap my head around the OS's in the game because the names are all so foriegn/random. I keep trying to figure out who the games version of "Microsoft" is or which OS is the "Windows" of my game world. But, that's my problem to deal with.
I know of one guy in the 80's who wrote about a Mario game he did not care for. He had disclaimers that it was an opinion piece. The company sued him and made him take his site down and they may have gotten an injuction so he could never write about them again (can't remember as it was so long ago).