Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Rook mp5 shouldn't have 2x if doc mp5 doesn't. Just give them the same sights because it's the same gun on virtually the same op. Likewise iana g36c should have 1.5x, there is no reason for it not to.
Worst distribution is Amaru G8 and Iq G8. Why does Amaru have twice the amount of scopes than Iq. Make the ops more viable rather than make them better because of the weapon they have.
Just awful attempt at trying to level pick rates. There is a reason Jag is always 90%+, he is viable, his weapon is nice, it had nice optics and he was played a lot before the nerfs, and despite them he is still a strong all around defender. You won't take away from people playing ops they have played for most of the game, and doing something like this shouldn't change anything.
7 Defenders got no new scopes and only 1 attacker got no new scopes, and that was glaz, but he doesn't need different scopes.
And on a personal note, mp7 1.5x is a joke, that gun doesn't need more than 1x...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Nope)
I'll just keep playing the classic Rainbow Six games I guess, you know the ones that weren't totally *mentally handicapped*