SOME BAD NEWS

[xof]

I hear that ubisoft will remove dx11 next season, is that true? At present, the experience of dx12 is very poor, with extremely unstable framerates.

[WreckerALeX]

Dx12 is amazing for me...not everyone having the issues but I understand as the game is going downhill.

[† <S k e a X>]

First of all i think the game is going downhill for some year now. Dx12 is rlly bad in this game for me and i never ever played vulcan before. Removing dx11 is rlly bad move i think and yea it is true they going to do it.

[AbsolutePug]

DX12 does have some more advanced graphics features but some say it causes performance issues. I ran the siege benchmark on my pc with the same graphics settings only changing the renderer and in my case they both had the same average fps but DX11 was more consistent compared to DX12 which had far more framerate fluctuation. I hope they keep DX11 around for a little longer or fix the issues with DX12

[WreckerALeX]

Originally posted by AbsolutePug:

DX12 does have some more advanced graphics features but some say it causes performance issues. I ran the siege benchmark on my pc with the same graphics settings only changing the renderer and in my case they both had the same average fps but DX11 was more consistent compared to DX12 which had far more framerate fluctuation. I hope they keep DX11 around for a little longer or fix the issues with DX12

Dx12 like Vulkan, has Reflex Low Latency and upscaling (DLSS, FXSR, FXSR2).

If there are more problems on dx12, of course choose dx11 as game was originally built from but dx12 using FXSR helps me squeeze a lot more fps.

[151]

Dx12 works okay with me now in this game as I now use RTX4060. But back when I was using GTX1060, dx12 runs bad on every game that I had to either pick dx11 or vulkan instead. And for R6S, Vulkan was the best option. It offers slightly worse graphics, but gives higher and more stable FPS. Removing dx11 would be a nightmare for people playing with lower end devices. Ubisoft really just hate the players.