Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Fr, they prefer releasing new cosmetics (that for some years haven't fit the theme of "tactical shooter") and supscriptions than to improve the game
But who buys the game?
1) Cheaters after they have been banned (cheap cheats mainly)
2) New players who serve as entertainment for the cheaters, until they realize there is a problem there and leave, but others will come.
This cycle repeats itself continuously and the game has found its state of equilibrium, with more or less the same player base each month, same amount of bans each month.
Nowadays companies have realized that this model is in a way inevitable in the multiplayer fps industry, and rather than dedicating efforts to find a solution, they live with it, this works without needing to dedicate millions in how to solve the cheating problem, which even investing is not guaranteed.
Could I blame Ubisoft for this? I could .. but like the rest of the companies.
Things I can blame Ubisoft for:
- Game with a lot of bugs, that are not going to be fixed
- Release of updates full of more bugs
- Vulkan is not working anymore
- Decisions against the majority of the community
- Poor servers
- Banning people who can't reconnect because of their bugs or servers
- Etc..
Yes, there are reasons to complain about this company.