Max fps you get ?

[Fmogaddam]

we can't get more then 144 in Rainbow or its just me ? . is there any body that can get +180 ?

[BAZ]

Uhm around max 260/200 depends on the map the most stable i can get.....(58fps limited personal like)

[Ghost Towncent]

I easily get 244 fps according to the frame limit

[Fmogaddam]

thank you so much in game i cant get more then 120 -130 and there is no difference to lower setting (turned off FPS limiter ) also from power option tried high performance or balanced there is no difference really have no idea

[Thomas Schlabberhut Sigma]

Originally posted by Fmogaddam:

thank you so much in game i cant get more then 120 -130 and there is no difference to lower setting (turned off FPS limiter ) also from power option tried high performance or balanced there is no difference really have no idea

Then your Processor is limiting

[BAZ]

I5 6500+GTX 960 100/120
I5 6500+RX 460 75/90
R5 1600+RX 580 200/230
With the I7 7700HQ i got around 200 as well so idk.....

[iHunter]

I5-9400F, RTX 2060, 16GB RAM, installed on HDD.
I limit my FPS to 75, but it is very smooth.

[X]

before last update with my 4090 and intel i9 in character gameplay I got over 600 and now im getting 300-400 but its dipping kind of sad that its happening because I had full max settings before

[Fmogaddam]

Originally posted by Lightning McQueen:

before last update with my 4090 and intel i9 in character gameplay I got over 600 and now im getting 300-400 but its dipping kind of sad that its happening because I had full max settings before

wow .you know i just wonder one thing so bad and not many people know this one must be expert . as far as i know . when you get 600 fps if your monitor is not 500 HZ you are not getting extra benefit is that right ? for example now your monitor must be 240 or 360 HZ so can we say that 600 fps is just number and effect less maybe waste of energy? same like when one gets 240 fps but plays with 60 Hz monitor that means its actually 60 fps remaining 180 is waste is that right ?

[BAZ]

No not really is just smoother as CRT has the most lowest latency from every monitor you can get this day thats why you need high refresh rate kinda.
The thing is 60hz and 100fps they all say you waste 40fps cuz 60hz but is not really true but a waste of CPU/GPU more.
I like to have a better CPU/GPU management than a high fps choppy stutter mess.
144hz i did use 141fps and 72fps as its half of the panel rate.
And no you dont need to have the same fps to see the full panel rate or to have smooth experience as some say 60fps on 144hz feels choppy well not for me as its smoooooooth and its a nice experience.(but i like my 60hz)

[Sticky White Stuff]

240HZ/240 FPS.
Ryzen 5 5600X
RX 6600 XT FC OC + OC

[Kachnicka]

uhh well for me on average its like 150 to 300 but sometimes for some reason it jumps to 2000 sometimes even 3000 fps

[󠁳 ⁧katti]

500+ on some maps.
some maps around 400

[󠁳 ⁧katti]

Originally posted by Fmogaddam:

Originally posted by Lightning McQueen:

before last update with my 4090 and intel i9 in character gameplay I got over 600 and now im getting 300-400 but its dipping kind of sad that its happening because I had full max settings before

wow .you know i just wonder one thing so bad and not many people know this one must be expert . as far as i know . when you get 600 fps if your monitor is not 500 HZ you are not getting extra benefit is that right ? for example now your monitor must be 240 or 360 HZ so can we say that 600 fps is just number and effect less maybe waste of energy? same like when one gets 240 fps but plays with 60 Hz monitor that means its actually 60 fps remaining 180 is waste is that right ?

the extra fps is not a waste. its sort of a buffer, you wont experience fps drops if they happen above the monitors refresh rate.

[󠁳 ⁧katti]

Originally posted by katti|10:15:

500+ on some maps.
some maps around 400

360Hz monitor, so I actually benefit from the high fps

[YOU]

280~320 depending on the map