HOW THE ♥♥♥♥ CAN BUCKS M4 HAS MORE RECOIL ON FULL AUTO THAN BLACKBEARDS SCARH ON FULL AUTO?

[Ledi]

READ THAT ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ THING UP THERE!!!!!!!!!!!

[Wayz]

Its a little thing called balance, that thing other people define and everyone else gets to complains about lol.
Its is a bit rough on auto that gun I agree.

[Johannes]

I like the gun, but the foooking recoil makes it impossible to kil lanyone past 3 meters.

[JUSTINBIA2]

ive never shot a scar h but shouldnt they have the same recoil because they both shoot 5.56

[Pvt. Stash]

Messaggio originale di JUSTINBIA2:

ive never shot a scar h but shouldnt they have the same recoil because they both shoot 5.56

No that's not how it works. Guns have different balance and handling just like a minivan handles differently than a corvette. I'm not an expert, so I won't try to explain it.

[JUSTINBIA2]

Messaggio originale di Pvt. Stash:

Messaggio originale di JUSTINBIA2:

ive never shot a scar h but shouldnt they have the same recoil because they both shoot 5.56

No that's not how it works. Guns have different balance and handling just like a minivan handles differently than a corvette. I'm not an expert, so I won't try to explain it.

i've shot guns just never a scar-h Im just assuming that an m4 and a scar h should have similar recoil. If anything shouldnt the scar have more because it looks larger and bulky.

[Pvt. Stash]

Messaggio originale di JUSTINBIA2:

Messaggio originale di Pvt. Stash:

No that's not how it works. Guns have different balance and handling just like a minivan handles differently than a corvette. I'm not an expert, so I won't try to explain it.

i've shot guns just never a scar-h Im just assuming that an m4 and a scar h should have similar recoil. If anything shouldnt the scar have more because it looks larger and bulky.

Again, I'm no expert so you'll want to do research yourself. It has to do with any number of things. Barrel length, gas compression tube size and position on the barrel, barrel density, material used for the weapon, and things like that all affect how the same round affects weapon position when you fire.

Here's a comparison I'm more familiar with. This google search shows all different kinds of sidearms that can fire a .38 round. Look at the size, shape, grip dimentions and such on each one. They all change how the weapon handles when the pin goes down. It's the same with assault rifles. A .38 round fired from a smaller weapon with a shorter barrel will have more recoil than a larger, heavier weapon with a longer barrel. It's just physics.

https://www.google.com/search?q=357+magnum+.38&espv=2&biw=1582&bih=756&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiMsNTTzenMAhXHej4KHahyC74QsAQIKw

[feelmyfullclip]

I do have weapon experience.

M4 shoots 5.56x45mm
Scar H 7.62x51mm

C8 SFW should have Scar recoil
and
Scar should have C8 SFW recoil.

[holy-death]

From what I know Blackbeard's gun have different recoil when using shield and different when not using it. That might be the reason.

[PhoenixOfArcadia]

Here's the thing many of you are forgetting:
Fire rate.

The C8 SFW has a very high firerate. It's actually close to that of the P90 and MP7. The SCAR-H has the fire rate similar slower than Thermite's 556xi.

If the time between shots is longer, it allows the weapon's barrel to level back out, negating some of the rise from the recoil.

[KoalafiedKiller]

the Scar H (H for Heavy), shoots 7.62mm. The Scar L (for light) shoots 5.56mm. So yes, Blackbeards Scar shoots 7.62mm. It seems funny that the guy with the face shield has less recoil for "balance" but the guy who is otherwise totally vulnerable has a nearly uncontrollable weapon....hmmm.....balance indeed.

[Merrick362]

Have any of you fired a C8 on automatic? 800 rpm cyclic rate and it weighs NOTHING. They're hard as hell to control.

[PhoenixOfArcadia]

Messaggio originale di Merrick362:

Have any of you fired a C8 on automatic? 800 rpm cyclic rate and it weighs NOTHING. They're hard as hell to control.

Hence my point of firerate attributing to it. The SCAR's fire rate is slow, meaning it has more time to negate some of the rise of recoil.

[Pvt. Stash]

Messaggio originale di FallenWarrior60:

Dont forget the weight of the weapon as well. I have shot 100's of guns and quite a few were automatic. I found guns that were heavier were less prone to severe recoil. The SCAR undoubtably has a heavy barrel and is heavier reducing the recoil.

This is true. That's why a .38 round fired from a snub-nosed revolver has more recoil than firing the same round from a 6 inch 357 magnum. That's also why people modify weapons to put compensators on the end of the barrel. The extra weight at the end of the weapon reduces recoil.

[feelmyfullclip]

Messaggio originale di Pvt. Stash:

Messaggio originale di FallenWarrior60:

Dont forget the weight of the weapon as well. I have shot 100's of guns and quite a few were automatic. I found guns that were heavier were less prone to severe recoil. The SCAR undoubtably has a heavy barrel and is heavier reducing the recoil.

This is true. That's why a .38 round fired from a snub-nosed revolver has more recoil than firing the same round from a 6 inch 357 magnum. That's also why people modify weapons to put compensators on the end of the barrel. The extra weight at the end of the weapon reduces recoil.

I totally agree with that and that the rate of fire affect muzzle climb/recoil also.

I just found it very weird that the scar H has less recoil than the c8sfw. They could have just let it the way it was before DUST LINE. IMO it was perfect.

[LostFriend]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDM7BOopGMI

The SCAR H being fired full auto