Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Vet player here. I want this to try and sound as unbiased as possible, but I know due to the nature of my job (and my title) that it makes it easier said than done.
I would still be playing Siege whether I was working for Ubi or not. I've been playing Siege since beta on PS4 and only really got into the game a few months before Operation Health. I've seen a lot of change in this game, and I feel like currently Siege is in it's best state in awhile in terms of meta and Operator balance. However, that's not to say it's without its issues. Server problems, cheaters, and various bugs are things that've existed in this game, however, I think the core of this game is incredibly strong. There's a reason players continue to go back to it no matter how frustrated it makes them at times, myself included.
Now, time for the Ubi part of me. The team has a lot of great plans for this game and plans to deal with the issues I've listed. Just today, we released an Anti-Cheat Dev Blog[www.ubisoft.com] that details more things we're doing to combat cheaters and prevent them from running rampant in our game. Cheaters frustrate us just as much as it does the player base, and we're committed to creating a better experience for the community.
seems like you dont know anything lol