安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Caveira's shotgun is a shotgun, it's both inconsistent and shows how close-range oriented Caveira is.
What does Glaz have to do with this conversation? Completely unrelated to Caveira in every single way.
If you have random teammates that get interrogated, it's both you and your random's fault for getting interrogated for the lack of communication.
He has DMR. Which is worse than Luison, especially if you put a silencer on it. And he is the character that is really in "a bad spot".
Putting other unneccessary parts aside, you just keep pushing the same line without any real arguements about Luison's place as a secondary. As I see it, you want it to stay the way it is, probably because you just like to play this character and don't want to see it nerfed it in any way.
Also everyone knows glaz is bad, saying someone is worst doesn't mean much, Jager has 90% pickrate, guess evernyone below him is balanced
Currently it's a always suppressed pistol with high recoil, lowest range, but mid damage and rof as well as nerfed magazine size that can't kill on headshot,
Glaz is in a way better spot than he was pre-buff in Shadow Legacy.
And you keep pushing the same lines that the Luison needs a nerf because you lost to a Caveira in Copper placements. So since you lost, you decided to go onto the Steam Discussions forums to say that the Luison needs a nerf when it doesn't. You want to nerf a character that is in a bad spot, possibly worse than Glaz, and you see it as a good decision. It's a good thing that Ubisoft doesn't really listen to posts like this or we would have even more terrible decisions than we already get.
Hope anyone saw it valuable.
Zero constructief and zero suggestion then nerfing a weapon without a good reason.
Like this guy said, Cav is in a bad spot.
Cav is good if enemies are not communicating at all, and going solo into the building while playing with their keyboard upside down.
You're so much better picking another operator with more utility and more help to the team.
You know which pistol is the most powerful (as powerful as DMR's), it's the PMM, that thing has 61 damage per bullet and is very easy to use.