Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The game would be ruined due to amount of smurfs and cheaters.
If somebody can afford a PC that can run Siege on minimum requirements they shouldn't have problems with find that 10-20$ for game.
CSGO hackers used to have insurance for anyone who bought their software :v Ban 1 get 1 free. Now it's free so it get even better! lol
PUBG is so desperated they have to hammer strike anyone using a weird software, including Pinyin Keyboard, Unikey Keyboard, or any supporting softwares for ICyber Cafe. Guess what?! It's dead too now.
R6 is a great game.
BattlEye is just a foundation a tool, its up to a developers to actually use it and how they want to use it. You can have 1 game using battleye that has no cheaters with great cheat protection and another that also uses battleye and have plenty of cheaters and barely any cheat protection.
And blatancy of a cheat doesnt have anything to do with the anticheat detection. Just because somebody hides aimbot or wallhack really well doesnt mean that battleye have harder time to detect it.