MK17 CQB

[unmaskedmasked]

Could we remove the ACOG off it, and compensate it with a larger magazine capacity?

[twunny phaiv]

it's already ♥♥♥♥♥♥ enough

[Copy & Cat]

Scar-H is commonly seen with a 20 round magazine

[UbiMorning]

Thanks for the suggestion! What would be your reasoning for removing the ACOG?

[♂ keikaekay ♂]

Publicado originalmente por Fatal Cutie:

Scar-H is commonly seen with a 20 round magazine

There is a 30 round mag for 7.62x51mm exist IRL, but rarely used as you expect. Mainly due to some flaws it has. The size of it makes shooting from the prone more difficult (not that it matters in Siege since gun models clip). It's like a giant hershey bar sticking out of your SCAR.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ejWpjzQqkQ

Come to think of it the PARA-308 chambered in 7.62x51mm has 30 round mag that uses the wrong model like when the AR-15 .50 had a quad stack. Escape from Tarkov has the correct 30 round mag for FAL and maybe Buck should get one for his CAMRS to make it stand out more than other DMRs in the game.

Give FN Herstal some love since they also made P90, FNP, SCAR, Five-SeveN and FAL that are in Siege already.

Publicado originalmente por UbiMorning:

Thanks for the suggestion! What would be your reasoning for removing the ACOG?

Removing ACOG from MK17 CQB will make it more of a close quarters option while the SR-25 is for longer ranges. Maybe then people would start to use the SR-25 more and the MK17 CQB for smaller maps.

[unmaskedmasked]

Publicado originalmente por UbiMorning:

Thanks for the suggestion! What would be your reasoning for removing the ACOG?

My reasoning for this is because the MK17 CQB is taken for close quarters combat in smaller maps where gun fights will again, be close quarters, the larger magazine size would be vastly more useful for this rather than the ACOG.

[twunny phaiv]

Publicado originalmente por ุ:

Publicado originalmente por UbiMorning:

Thanks for the suggestion! What would be your reasoning for removing the ACOG?

My reasoning for this is because the MK17 CQB is taken for close quarters combat in smaller maps where gun fights will again, be close quarters, the larger magazine size would be vastly more useful for this rather than the ACOG.

a faster ADS speed would be much more beneficial than 10 more bullets, that ♥♥♥♥ slow as molasses

[unmaskedmasked]

Publicado originalmente por twunny phaiv:

Publicado originalmente por ุ:

My reasoning for this is because the MK17 CQB is taken for close quarters combat in smaller maps where gun fights will again, be close quarters, the larger magazine size would be vastly more useful for this rather than the ACOG.

a faster ADS speed would be much more beneficial than 10 more bullets, that ♥♥♥♥ slow as molasses

You don't need the ADS as you should be already aiming down sights before peaking anything in general, especially as BB. Sounds like user error on your part.

[Copy & Cat]

Well BB is made for holding angles and surviving exchanges so he has a low tier weapons to counter a very OP ability (surviving headshots) so in high level play he's in a good spot

[unmaskedmasked]

Publicado originalmente por Fatal Cutie:

Well BB is made for holding angles and surviving exchanges so he has a low tier weapons to counter a very OP ability (surviving headshots) so in high level play he's in a good spot

Which is why I stated nothing about buffing his primary gadget in anyway at all. I agree that his shield is good.

[Copy & Cat]

Publicado originalmente por ุ:

Publicado originalmente por Fatal Cutie:

Well BB is made for holding angles and surviving exchanges so he has a low tier weapons to counter a very OP ability (surviving headshots) so in high level play he's in a good spot

Which is why I stated nothing about buffing his primary gadget in anyway at all. I agree that his shield is good.

Well most of his power comes form his gadget, giving him a better gun would just be an upgrade to an already strong op is what i mean

[unmaskedmasked]

Publicado originalmente por Fatal Cutie:

Publicado originalmente por ุ:

Which is why I stated nothing about buffing his primary gadget in anyway at all. I agree that his shield is good.

Well most of his power comes form his gadget, giving him a better gun would just be an upgrade to an already strong op is what i mean

It's not giving him a better gun as I am not asking for another primary weapon or stat changes, removing the ACOG removes range capacity from the MK17, and by compensating it with a few more rounds per a magazine plays more into the close quarters aspects of the weapons design in general. Which is honestly a fair trade.