安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
How do you feel events would benefit from having the "Vote to Kick" option removed? Removing that feature would prevent players from kicking out a toxic player.
I highly doubt matches would last long enough for someone to be toxic though. Defenders can't kill each other and the worst attackers can do is get one hit in and that's that before rff is activated.
The benefits are getting to play the game. Having fun. Gaining renown for matches you participated in, even if you didn't get kills but won the round in a 1v3 situation as a defender.. All of those benefits are cut out when someone kicks you for something because they aren't patient or blame stuff on others. Who cares if someone accidentally hits you with a kapkan trap when you're defending, you're still one hit to a hammer, camping is a natural thing to win the game as a defender, throwing a gu mine or grzmot at you? 5 damage. Big deal. It's the same with nearly any reason. People in chat being toxic? Report them, mute them. Problem solved.