Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Its a trade off, destructable hidden cameras or highly obvious cams that *can* be destroyed but much harder to be destroyed.
Exactly
good points, but why does it matter how subtle it is if its inpervious to bullets? i mean sure valk cams are hard to see but you get them eventually, and they cant see through smoke and all that crazy stuff. My point is, if the cams are borderline invincible, why would you use the small throwables? i know valk tricks like popping a hole in a wall and throwing it between so you get a LoS into both rooms, but that makes your cam super obvious. again, i think either shutters should open or your team simply cannot use it.
edit:
Oh it's impervious to melee attacks. That doesn't sound very cool to me. Sounds gamebreaking.
or shotgun the area around it or behind it if its breakable and to destroys itself
But. Yes they are good, and I very often meet Sledge/Ash in the games. So I think when you get used to this cams they wouldn't be a problem at all. Plus if maestro see s1 planting, I guarantee he will open his can to shot that bast*rd and this is the moment for your teammate to destroy the cam.