Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's a valid concern and maybe depending on how long the match is 4vs5 should be taken into account. But I myself don't think a player "earns" a full MMR win for playing against a team with 4 players.
Not saying I disagree, I am sick to the back teeth of getting to Gold 2 and everything is balanced and fine.. then all of a sudden you get matched against smurfs, or there is a hacker on your team, or someone disconnects and doesn't come back.
It's like an endless cycle of getting to the rank you should be at and then getting shot in the foot because of idiocy.
It's almost like you can't solo queue ranked.. maybe there should be two separate ranked queues for solo and pre-made?
Maybe a first step should be lowering the MMR lose for the 4 player team. That way you don't punish the winners but help alleviate the frustration with the losers (MMR lose depending on how many rounds you played with an incomplete team, that way if someone quiets at 3-0 it doesn't cheat the system in giving a very low MMR hit. Next step is keeping people who quit out of ranked games.
I feel that endless cycle as well, nicely phrased!