Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

Buck C8 SFW needs to Buffed !!!!!
Buck rifle C8 SFW need to de decrease its recoil I know its a fair and a realistic game But its damage is low before it was 42 now 38 like tf its has a recoil like ♥♥♥♥♥♥ F35 jet im just sayin that it need to lower its recoil because it took my 25000renown FGS Plz Senpai Plz Senpai Onegai !!!!!!!!!!:100::Takedown::theskull:
Отредактировано KNi☠︎x™; 6 янв. 2017 г. в 16:19
< >
Сообщения 1626 из 26
Well most guns have a decent recoil, it's just that because of the lack of front grip it makes this weapon recoil stand out even more, all other operators can use the the grip to reduce recoil greatly so bucks gun that can't use them seem even stronger than usual, honestly tha grip is so useful that's there's no reason to no use it
Автор сообщения: Fookin' Christmas
Well most guns have a decent recoil, it's just that because of the lack of front grip it makes this weapon recoil stand out even more, all other operators can use the the grip to reduce recoil greatly so bucks gun that can't use them seem even stronger than usual, honestly tha grip is so useful that's there's no reason to no use it

Depends, I use angled grip for some ops for quick aiming, it does work
Автор сообщения: wine
1) It's a balancing factor. If it had recoil similar to other rifles, it would be the most broken thing in the game.
2) This entire post is going on r/copypasta.

how so? it has a slower firerate than Ash's AR and lower damage.
Автор сообщения: Warslag
The balancing in R6S is one of the things that makes me truly respect the Ubisoft developers.
So you think it's good? Even after what they did to blackbeard ?
the assault rifle is useless. dmr is better
Автор сообщения: AristoCat
Автор сообщения: Warslag
The balancing in R6S is one of the things that makes me truly respect the Ubisoft developers.
So you think it's good? Even after what they did to blackbeard ?
I do. He's still totally viable, and I've had good results with him. He's not insane anymore like he used to be with his singular 800 HP shield.


Автор сообщения: Warslag
Автор сообщения: AristoCat
So you think it's good? Even after what they did to blackbeard ?

He has some IMBA rifles there you have to admit.
I don't know. All I know is the people ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about having to aim at somewhere other than the head when dealing with him and due to their ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ubisoft over nerfed him.
Отредактировано post apocalypse otter boi; 6 янв. 2017 г. в 20:05
Автор сообщения: Admiral Obvious
Автор сообщения: AristoCat
So you think it's good? Even after what they did to blackbeard ?
I do. He's still totally viable, and I've had good results with him. He's not insane anymore like he used to be with his singular 800 HP shield.
60 hp is too low, and they shouldn't have messed with his ads or his guns.
also just because you an still use him that doesn't mean he is balanced. That's like saying some people can play chess blindfolded so chess is obviously suppose to be played while blind folded.
Отредактировано post apocalypse otter boi; 6 янв. 2017 г. в 20:07
Автор сообщения: AristoCat
Автор сообщения: Admiral Obvious
I do. He's still totally viable, and I've had good results with him. He's not insane anymore like he used to be with his singular 800 HP shield.
60 hp is too low, and they shouldn't have messed with his ads or his guns.

I'd rather have had either or on the nerfs. Doing both at the same time was a pretty awful idea. I personally am good with the 60 HP shield, the ADS nerf is annoying to deal with, but not intolerable, and it does fit his role of being the one to hold the angle.
Автор сообщения: Admiral Obvious
Автор сообщения: AristoCat
60 hp is too low, and they shouldn't have messed with his ads or his guns.

I'd rather have had either or on the nerfs. Doing both at the same time was a pretty awful idea. I personally am good with the 60 HP shield, the ADS nerf is annoying to deal with, but not intolerable, and it does fit his role of being the one to hold the angle.
Perhaps. But I still stand by what I said. People are always saying that you should git gud When dealing with any other operator being considered op, yet they failed to do exactly that when dealing with BB.
Автор сообщения: AristoCat
Автор сообщения: Admiral Obvious

I'd rather have had either or on the nerfs. Doing both at the same time was a pretty awful idea. I personally am good with the 60 HP shield, the ADS nerf is annoying to deal with, but not intolerable, and it does fit his role of being the one to hold the angle.
Perhaps. But I still stand by what I said. People are always saying that you should git gud When dealing with any other operator being considered op, yet they failed to do exactly that when dealing with BB.

It's hard to deny, at least initially, he was pretty broken.

The first nerf was reasonable, and if they just nerfed the ADS time while the shield was on, it would've been perfect. However they decided to nerf both aim times, and the shield further.
< >
Сообщения 1626 из 26
Показывать на странице: 1530 50

Дата создания: 6 янв. 2017 г. в 16:17
Сообщений: 26