Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
size and weight are not as significant in regards to predation in the water as you make it sound, fact is these are prehistoric animals whos behaviors and methods are left largly to theory as few fossils of these animals exist and even fewer exist with other fossils in the stomach cavity to show any inkling what they ate exactly. you can be safe saying a 55 foot mosasaur didn't swallow a 70 foot megalodon whole but you can not say that megalodon was in no way on the menu for other large predators, in the animal kingdom few things if any are so cut and dry.
Essentially the best thing they could eventually do is to balance out the ocean with more creatures and redistribute things.
For example, it makes sense that currently the meg is the obnoxious swarm mob in the game in the sea since......they don't really have anything else yet. However it would be best if eventually they would flip it's position with the mosasaurus. The meg should be the giant deep water rarely seen predator while mosasaurus should be the shallow water threat. Hell that's even in line with what history and science has to say about these two creatures. Both should be uncommon encounters as well as being significant fights when you do run into them.
Keep them both large animals, the meg should be upped in size to be more impressive with stats to match. Finally we just need more sea life (which should come eventually). More passive creatures like the plesiousaur to act as prey and just "atmosphere" to the oceans. Many more smaller to medium sized animals would help both as threats and as food sources.
The big problem at the moment is that currently you hop into the water and you see maybe a coelacanth, maybe some turtles near the shore, and then it's just tons of megs which, as mentioned above, are just moderately over-sized white sharks and not really all that intimidating. Add to this the fact that they have this (sorry I have to say it) stupid schooling / swarming code and you just get an annoying mob to deal with that quickly stops being interesting or a threat and just a general annoyance to ocean exploration.
I know this is largely because they just don't have all the stuff in place and they've got to work with what they have so that we have SOME content. I just hope that somewhere down the line they readdress the oceanic ecosystem in the game. Sadly I think we'll be stuck with the current "piranha megs" since for some odd reason they chose to make a mosasaurus a deep water predator which it never was in reality. Like they mixed up the roles of the two animals. Plus they'd have to revisit the dossiers on at least the Mosasaurus to correct this.
Oh well....
I'm not sure your point here is??
I'd rather Meglaodon's be significantly more rare, but larger and more powerful. No reason they should be second fiddfle to a smaller, less powerful carnivore.
That's my point. A large part of your argument is subjective and not based on any facts whatsoever.. Meanwhile, I have scientisits in my corner saying Megalodon's are the apex predator of the sea and strong bite force of all-time and you have.... non-credentialed questiones.
So, if realisism isn't a focus then why focus on the herd-like behavior of certain mobs or the vegetiation of mobs? Answer: it IS a focus, but a convenient way to brush off the short-comings of ARK in a fanboy way.
in a previous topic regarding the megs being kind of small.
Keyword in OP's post, scientists "suggested".
With that in mind anyone can claim artistic freedom since there is no real fact about anything.
Also, since Megalodon was so large, it would have a great difficulty turning around. Like today's blue whale which takes its time turning around. So, while the Megalodon would be struggling to just keep the Mosasaur in his sightline, the Mosasaur would have bitten a few big chunks here and there.
BTW They didn't even live in the same era, so this is like the T-Rex vs Spinosaur argument
Surprised nobody caught this one..."Irregardless" is not a word. The word is Regardless, adding the ir is a double negative
Anything is cooler then shark, minus dodo.
Spiders and scorpions too, I hate them....
Which must be really cool, because sharks are cool.