Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Beyond that, gameplay wise it's complete nonsense that a creature that let's you completely bypass someone's defenses by flying over them can also be used as a siege weapon.
And are you aware that this is a game? With impossible themes at that.
Why do people ask these stupid questions in seriousness?
I can punch trees for materials, and even dinos for hide and meat!
There's a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ dragon in this game!
TAMED TRIKE MUTHATRUCKER!
Guns!
I can punch dinos!
Seriously, the bird is the LAST thing on everyones minds as to why it can do damage,
Real life aside, gameplay wise it's stupid that flying mounts can also siege. Why would you even need a T-Rex or Spinosaur to assault bases if you can use something that can fly over a person's fences?
Hmmm, I don't know, why WOULD someone ask about the balance of something in an Early Access game? Yep, cause the devs got it 100% right off the get go. There's no room for improvement. The game is perfectly balanced right now. Mhmm
Yes but from a gameplay standpoint, he's right, Argentavis, and flying mounts in general, shouldn't be siege weapons. It makes them unbalanced. It should be the purpose of land mounts as ankylo, stego, mammoth, bronto.