Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
But the hips and legs described by Ibrahim and coauthors look quite small and relatively weak. The femur – or upper leg bone – is short, yet has a robust flange of bone for a major leg-tail muscle retractor. And the foot bones of Spinosaurus are flat, with broad toe claws. This was not a dinosaur suited to running down prey
http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/09/11/the-new-spinosaurus/
TBH, Ibrahim is a bit of a quack to me. Apparently, short legs = quadruped, because logic.
However, I do agree that Spinosaurus was not a brontophagist (land predator). Instead, I think it hunted in the water.
I'm not saying to everyone that I am right as such, I will listen to other peoples opinions. But I am led to believe that the Spinosaurus is nothing like the Hollywood version in the slightest.
And I do believe that the devs have gotten it right in going with what the main media are saying at the moment on the subject.
You'd be correct although to be fair most creatures that operate in water but can walk around on land are typically quadropeds, crocodiles, frogs, hippos?, etc. Also the Spinosaurus went extinct due to rising water levels and being pushed into Carcharodontosaurus territory, but getting back on topic we usually judge how dinosaurs stood based leg bone size like how T-rex has broad leg bones, Of course everything we judge about dinosaurs is purely theoretical at best.
Oh, and that's probably just me, but I also think the quadrupedal charge is more intimidating than the bipedal one we got with tyranossaurus and co: feels like there is more weight in the way the spino moves. Maybe my mind has an easier time associating it with big predators (bear!), while all it can really link a t-rex running with is some kind of oversized chicken or something.
So, yeah, if you really don't like the way it looks, er, just leave my spino alone and ride a t-rex? Pretty please?
Why isn't it possible to like comments on steam?
* The specific names are different from real world counterparts
* The Parasaurs are entirely bipedal (instead of Quadrupedal and Bipedal)
* The Parasaurs have "horns" growing out of their shoulders
* The Dilophosaurs aren't 10' long
* The Dilophosaurs have frills
* The Trike's front feet are incorrectly shaped
* The Bronto's neck is held vertically instead of horizontally
* The Pteradons can take flight from flat ground instead of throwing themselves off a cliff
Etc...
For "easy" research in how all of the Ark's denizens are incorrect (Not just the Spinosaur) maybe check out "Your Dinosaurs are Wrong" on YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaCDmykyjVw_B983AQ2iGuZOA3ZLJ8Sry
It's a good starting point
Just because it's cool! Not because it's realistic.
Parasaurs as well. It should have some time where it walks or rests on all fours.