Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
I will do, as soon as I get home from work this evening. Thanks a lot. All I'm saying is that he shouldn't bother posting something like "Compound bow does 33 dmg and crossbow does 47, compound bow sucks!" when clearly the testing has been completely invalid due to the unforeseen variables.
And the main thing is, he shot normal arrows from the compound bow and still expects a valid comparison.
You should be comparing the compound bow with metal arrows, vs. the crossbow with stone arrows and bow with stone arrows (since that's the best ammo each one can use).
Testing the compound bow with stone arrows for DPS is like getting a fabricated sniper rifle and using simple bullets with it, then saying that it sucks. Surely the WHOLE POINT of making the compound bow is so that you can use METAL ARROWS with it?!
Completely right and thanks for posting this. Rumors get spread by people lazily "comparing" things and not doing it properly.
You do know there is no such a thing right? I would point the lack of accuracy but meh.
Comparing the weapons using stone arrows makes a lot of sense since that what most folks will be using most of the time, since they are prevalent and cheap to make (like primary ammo should be).
At the end of the day you can look at the early results from basic apples to apples comparisons like we saw here, and look at the analysis of the materials required and basically come to the conclusion that there is little reason beyond bragging rights to build one right now.
I'll stick with me Xbow as a primary weapon until some one can show me the benefit for using a compound bow is worth the opportunity cost of the effort and resources required to make and maintain it.
I will be doing some proper testing myself later with damage from all weapons and ammo types and putting up some results maybe on the ARK wiki and here, because there doesn't seem to be much but speculation right now, especially with this newly released bow and arrows :)
As far as I am aware, this new bow and metal arrows are designed to be on-par with guns, for those of us who simply prefer to use bows as a preference (not to mention their are way more stealthy). So I am expecting to find results of similar damage with metal arrows as to the current high-tier bullets.
Would love that, data is always welcome. We dont have to agree all the time, discussion sparks evolution. And, glad to see the damn real sniper rifle coming.
Im just waiting to get the item IDs to test the thing in SP with the different values.
This is the only information I've seen so far and it doesn't yet include the new bow and metal arrows, nor a proper comparison of crossbow using stone arrows: http://ark.gamepedia.com/Weapon_Damage
I will try to add to this page later when I get chance to play and do some testing.
Why not just spawn in all the raw materials with current ID's and build one for testing? Don't have to spawn in the item itself directly :D
Your tests are off I fired on LIVE official 36 server 50 arrows and it is close to broken not quite broke. Also the damage with normal arrows is about his estimate however on a level 148 trex with a 44armor apprentice saddle it did just under 100 dmg MORE then a 144% longneck. Headshots only were used.
not sure the pistol costs a ton and it is crap so no telling with these guys but maybe they just hate guns.