Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not to turn down on your idea but it's easier. Make taming faster, but make it that you have to prepare to get good stats, if you do it on the spot you get, meh stats. Only those who have worked hard to maintain which dino they want to tame should get the beneficial stats.
I also admit that endgame they should all be tamed differently, but some variant of what I proposed can be used. All dinos can optionally be knocked out and taken somewhere safe... or a completely in the wild tame can be used with my method. Then you can use the current food style passive tame (with some tweaks) on herbivores, carnivores can be the same... but you would need the ability to drop the food. (Or perhaps kill an animal for it and bait it to the corpse)
While I don't deny that you have a point, I do believe it is not the direction to go with what is supposed to be a survival game. There is some amount of realism compared to other genres. What I take this to mean is that if I need to eat or I die, (Cause that's how it works in real life) than it should take time to tame a creature. (Cause that's how it works in real life)
Preparation for better stats is a great idea, but removing the tame time I disagree with. 100 poor stat Rexs are still terrifying.
You clearly have no seen the first season of YuGiOh! Okay, I'm kidding but realistic, if you have a dog and you want it to learn you punish it. Sure it's completely different than what I'm saying but some force is needed to tame the wild carnivores that attack on sight. You don't tame Lions unless they're young etc. That would require too much work, and would mean you can't tame any wild dino.
Now, if you want me to makeup a reason for why knocking out dinos be tamed it's simple. Your implant actually lets you mind control them, and you're just giving them food to so they're more subjective to it. Food is the way to a man and a dino's heart.
I know I kinda took away from your thread but there has to be a line between complexity/realism and simple and not over bearing. I think too many tamed ways for each animal would require too much knowledge that you need to play the game well. That's why I don't think it's worth the work.
Edit: As for the non-violent taming of aggressive dinos, that probably will be only for some and probably the same system for all of them, which is what OP isn't referring to.
Now if we just leave it to mind control...
Using violence/force to obtain submission is a quick short term fix but will blow up on you down the line.
I did say that lower the time but also remove the stats equivalent to it. Right now they are still scary but you nerf them, and suddenly it is pretty simple.
Now I am not agreeing with less than one hour taming people. I meant around 3 hours for a rex with just raw meat, and subpar stats.
NO one, at all said force or violence. I said punish. I was making a joke on the fact that they said you punch someone. Was not being serious, but you're wrong completely, because only in this game are dinos highly intelligent as dogs, they should PROBABLY be dumb as freak.
http://www.animalcognition.org/2015/03/14/reptiles-can-learn-through-imitation/#
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/coldblooded-does-not-mean-stupid.html?_r=0
Do go on :p
That logic is also not quite sound, I would advise a quick read over Operant Conditioning[en.wikipedia.org]. There is a time and place for both punishment and reinforcement. But if you want to take that aspect it is totally fine, then we add a method to punish. However, force feeding an unconscious body does not fall under that category either.
It wans't supposed to be sound logic. The was just a joke, on your joke about punching me out. Please don't dwell on it. What I'm saying is everyone needs a good punch at times.
Okay, lets get this straight. Pre-historic. Assuming you follow evolution, we should assume that they were dumb, in fact before some major research on dinosaurs it used to believe that due to how reptiles brain worked that they had pretty darn tiny brains. Again, I'm not spewing fact because we can't prove completely new about dinosaurs, I wasn't referring to reptiles at all. I think you are bravely mistaken on that assumption.
Edit: Also, I am not saying I can confirm intelligence on brain size or anything, but that was just my assumption on evolution.
Im not going to assume anything other than most invertebrates were dumb,(And now we are finding that even insects can learn from bad experince, wasps can remember faces and base their future actions based of previous experinces for up to two weeks) for decades, centuries even people thought birds namely parrots were dumb, it turns out they are as smart as chimpanzees, use tools and have distict langauges.
We are finding offically now that reptiles, some such as crocs, which were around with the dinosaurs are now being shown to be smarter than previously thought. It would be a huge act of faith to believe that just because dinosaurs were "first: that they were also dumb.
We are finding evidence of social interactions with T-rexes, more examples of parental care among other dinosaurs, and as such you need a fair degree of intellgence if you live in social situations such as raptors for example. Its highly likely that some of the herding dinos were likely smart as well.
And while I am sure some were smarter than others it would be wrong to simply assume that all were stupid.
As for the "evidence" of a million years ago, is hardly evidence. I mean honestly, I'm not saying they were dumb as balls, but I wouldn't think of them as itelligent either.
Dinosaurs could have a parental instinct rather than actual intelligence found in all animals. I am not going to discuss this. It was my assumption and there's less proof against it.