安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
All points regarding trolling, thread searching and forum etiquette have been made - Back to the original post....
Leviathan, you need to address or acknowledge the answers you've received. The Raptor in the game currently is not a Velociraptor. As with many Dinos in Ark - Wildcard are taking creative freedom with a lot of their Dinos, even resorting to naming them differently.
Not speaking on their behalf here, but I'm fine with the Dinos not looking like "Real ones" because:
I hope this was a more acceptable reply to your thread.
No kidding man, I can't believe they made this dino so unrealistic. Heck, with that said, they also made the Dragon and DodoRex unrealistic!
But there is just something about stuff like the velociraptor or the triceratops, which were also a controversy in the real world, regarding their appearance and what they really are. Those kinda bother me a bit.
It's like, putting in a dalmatian dog, and calling it on its proper scientific Latin name, just like in the books, but it's actually 100 feet long and and eats mesosaurus exclusively.
Read the latin names in the dossiers, they are different, which means different animal.
Tyranosaurus Dominum, is larger than T-Rex, for example.
You've got you aesthetic tastes and that's not in dispute. But the current representation actually allows for more visual diversity (which is important in a game). the larger point is that again, these are fictional subspecies, even in the dossier's this is occasionally nodded at.
here are a couple not quite right IRL issues if you wanna pick it apart:
Brontosaurus - which was a thing then wasn't then (after it's introduction to the game) was a thing again.
Dilo's were up to 6 feet tall... no the tiny things in game (again JP's influence)
The "Rex" being sooo much bigger than it should be (subspecies)
I mean you could keep digging. But play-ability, recognizably, and aesthetics are going to be what the devs focus on for their vision of the game. By all means say what you do or don't like, but because they are all clearly labeled fictional subspecies there isn't much of a "scientific" argument to be made for what should look like what IMO.
not feathered
Because none of the random, creatively choiced artist renditions on the page show it as such?
It says right in the middle:
"The arms, legs, and tails were covered in true feathers, whilst the rest of their body was probably covered in protofeathers."
Until their doomsday device backfired. That's why they are extinct now.
It's like putting in a human and calling it a human, but it has a bag of holding built into its arm and it is recreated in a new body upon death.
That's why we call it a game, not a documentary. Scientific accuracy takes a back seat to game play.
This isn't even a simulation. The "science" in this game is to add flavor, not educate.