Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
http://i.imgur.com/xicOfVq.png
PS: Still overjoyed we're getting a bear
Red Baron: all false.
yutyrannus is not a scaled down rex, in fact, it looks much more different from the rex or giga than the Siats
and, Siats didnt live in the snow...
Actually yes, yes it did. The Siats fossil along with similar finds up in Montana show the Utah fossils were only on the southern tip of the range at most. Siats was like the Brown Bear or Pleistocene lion of its day, living in a wide variety of enviroments. Some of which would have included extremely cold climates. Even the Utah climate at the time was much colder than it is now due to the presence of conifer fossils typically found in cold weather. The Utah Siats population probably lived in a climate similar to modern say North Dakota, which means it DID live in places it snowed quite a lot.
As for Yutyrannus' body plan. Same indicative square shaped head, same tooth length variation, similar limb preportions with a bit longer arms. I could look at it for a few seconds and tell it was a Tyrannosaurid. Siats however had a very different looking head, much larger arms, and had a body plan one would not expect of a Tyrannosaurid. Yutyrannus was a part of the lineage tha lead into Tyrannosaurus rex, Siats was a Megaraptorid that branched off the Tyrannosaurid line and went a completely different route.
You can't get much more different of a relative if trained paleontologists mistook Megaraptorids for Carnosaurs for several decades, the true relation only coming to light when Megaraptorians starts popping up in places Carnosaurs didn't live in and someone noticed a few very un-Carnosaur-like traits in the limb joints and internals of the skull.
And the final nail in the coffin for me of having Yutyrannus in as you'd want is is you'd insist it be the apex predator. Yutyrannus could work in Ark, as a Carnotaurus equivilent. We're talking an animal that weighed A ton at the abosolute most, meaning it was lighter than the upcoming Arctodus and signficiantly lighter than the Mammoth. Siats by comparison was 4 tons at the absolute minimum.
Yutyrannus's current max weight estimate - 1,500lbs
Arctodus's current max weight estimate - 2,2500lbs
Arctotherium's current max weight estimate - 4,200lbs
These are DINOSAURS, ANIMALS not super invincible dragons. Creatures that came before or after them aren't automatically worse. A Fasolasuchus would probably whoop most theropod's tails save for the really big ones and an Andrewsarchus would maul a Yutyrannus to death.
Because Irondude wouldn't shut up about how "infinately" better Yutyrannus was to the Arctodus, I shot down his arguements. When he brought up Yutyrannus would be an apex predator for snow biome dinosaurs, I proved him wrong by bringing up Siats. Arguements erupted, and now we got this thread.
Cool, what would you have in mind? We seem to have a lot of the general spots filled with the small pterosaurs, medium pterosaurs, large pterosaur, and big predatory bird.