ARK: Survival Evolved

ARK: Survival Evolved

View Stats:
Shockal May 5, 2019 @ 1:28am
Disk Space
Currently, undermeshing is a hot problem that most ARK players are aware of. However, there's a second problem that isn't mentioned as much: disc space.

ARK takes up an unbelievable amount of Disc space, requiring a whopping 100 Gigabytes (and that's not even with DLC!). It can really irritate many people, and for me, it especially does since my computer can barely handle the disc size.

I'd really like it if people could also surface the problem of Disc Space to the community more often. Imo, it's just as important as undermeshing as it's currently prohibiting a LOT of players from even playing the game itself.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 19 comments
Fryskar May 5, 2019 @ 1:34am 
isn't it more like 160gb?
But yes its extremly large.
Vesuvius May 5, 2019 @ 1:38am 
200g in my Ark folder.... 40g of that is mods... and i have all 6 DLC.

Ark simply isnt going to get smaller.

And to be honest... 160g with ALL 6 dlc?... thats realy not even bad.
Last edited by Vesuvius; May 5, 2019 @ 1:39am
stoneyoda May 5, 2019 @ 1:42am 
Originally posted by Vesuvius:
200g in my Ark folder.... 40g of that is mods... and i have all 6 DLC.

Ark simply isnt going to get smaller.

And to be honest... 160g with ALL 6 dlc?... thats realy not even bad.
i have none of the dlc's and no mods and my game takes up 142.2 gb of space, thats out of control
Shockal May 5, 2019 @ 1:42am 
Originally posted by Vesuvius:
200g in my Ark folder.... 40g of that is mods... and i have all 6 DLC.

Ark simply isnt going to get smaller.

And to be honest... 160g with ALL 6 dlc?... thats realy not even bad.

Most of us don't have a robust computer
Vesuvius May 5, 2019 @ 1:46am 
Originally posted by Shockal:
Originally posted by Vesuvius:
200g in my Ark folder.... 40g of that is mods... and i have all 6 DLC.

Ark simply isnt going to get smaller.

And to be honest... 160g with ALL 6 dlc?... thats realy not even bad.

Most of us don't have a robust computer
Robust?.... a 2t hdd is cheap as chips. Most crappy pre-built pc's have a 2tb standard.

What you're saying is games should be smaller because you cant get a bigger drive.
simon May 5, 2019 @ 1:54am 
Originally posted by Shockal:
Currently, undermeshing is a hot problem that most ARK players are aware of. However, there's a second problem that isn't mentioned as much: disc space.

ARK takes up an unbelievable amount of Disc space, requiring a whopping 100 Gigabytes (and that's not even with DLC!). It can really irritate many people, and for me, it especially does since my computer can barely handle the disc size.

I'd really like it if people could also surface the problem of Disc Space to the community more often. Imo, it's just as important as undermeshing as it's currently prohibiting a LOT of players from even playing the game itself.

The only way to do that is to remove content. The size is due to all the assets in the game which is also one of its strong points. Its a large world with a lot of different flora and fauna and people like that.

Its also not likely that a PC that can run this game will have small hard drives. If you can afford the system to run this game then you can afford a 2TB drive.
Fryskar May 5, 2019 @ 2:38am 
Originally posted by simon:
Originally posted by Shockal:
Currently, undermeshing is a hot problem that most ARK players are aware of. However, there's a second problem that isn't mentioned as much: disc space.

ARK takes up an unbelievable amount of Disc space, requiring a whopping 100 Gigabytes (and that's not even with DLC!). It can really irritate many people, and for me, it especially does since my computer can barely handle the disc size.

I'd really like it if people could also surface the problem of Disc Space to the community more often. Imo, it's just as important as undermeshing as it's currently prohibiting a LOT of players from even playing the game itself.

The only way to do that is to remove content. The size is due to all the assets in the game which is also one of its strong points. Its a large world with a lot of different flora and fauna and people like that.

Its also not likely that a PC that can run this game will have small hard drives. If you can afford the system to run this game then you can afford a 2TB drive.
I'm pretty sure someone willing could massive reduce the storage needed by reworking their models (depending on how you model anything it can take a lot of space more, less dots =less space).
But that would be work for they won't earn more money.
margalus May 5, 2019 @ 2:57am 
Disk space isn't an issue when you can buy 4TB drives for $100.
Last edited by margalus; May 5, 2019 @ 2:57am
simon May 5, 2019 @ 3:11am 
Originally posted by Fryskar:
Originally posted by simon:

The only way to do that is to remove content. The size is due to all the assets in the game which is also one of its strong points. Its a large world with a lot of different flora and fauna and people like that.

Its also not likely that a PC that can run this game will have small hard drives. If you can afford the system to run this game then you can afford a 2TB drive.
I'm pretty sure someone willing could massive reduce the storage needed by reworking their models (depending on how you model anything it can take a lot of space more, less dots =less space).
But that would be work for they won't earn more money.

The number of polygons in the models is not the reason the game is the size it is. Its all the different models and the associated assets. They are not even very high poly models to start with.
Fryskar May 5, 2019 @ 3:34am 
Originally posted by simon:
Originally posted by Fryskar:
I'm pretty sure someone willing could massive reduce the storage needed by reworking their models (depending on how you model anything it can take a lot of space more, less dots =less space).
But that would be work for they won't earn more money.

The number of polygons in the models is not the reason the game is the size it is. Its all the different models and the associated assets. They are not even very high poly models to start with.
Depending on how poor you do it, its enough.

Originally posted by Mufti:
Originally posted by simon:

The number of polygons in the models is not the reason the game is the size it is. Its all the different models and the associated assets. They are not even very high poly models to start with.

Meshes barely take up any space. It's textures and audio. Why bother posting just to blatantly lie?
Textures sure but audio taking a lot of space? nah.

WC isn't a quality seeking company, so i'll just dare to say they could optimise a lot.
Filip May 5, 2019 @ 3:37am 
well the only problem i see is with ssds, as a 1tb ssd can be quite expensive
Shockal May 5, 2019 @ 5:44am 
Originally posted by Filip:
well the only problem i see is with ssds, as a 1tb ssd can be quite expensive

I just bought one an hour ago

Gameplay demanded it, unfortunately
Last edited by Shockal; May 5, 2019 @ 6:44am
Seftak (Banned) May 5, 2019 @ 6:05am 
And do any of you think crying about how poor you are will make it so companies stop making highly demanding and heavy games? It's your damn fault for not investing in better hardwares. Stop trying to blame other people for your failure.
Last edited by Seftak; May 5, 2019 @ 6:45am
Shockal May 5, 2019 @ 6:46am 
Originally posted by Seftak:
And do any of you think crying about how poor you are will make it so companies stop making highly demanding and heavy games? It's your damn fault for not investing in better hardwares. Stop trying to blame other people for you failure.

"It's your damn fault for not investing in better hardwares"

No it is not
margalus May 5, 2019 @ 6:51am 
Originally posted by Filip:
well the only problem i see is with ssds, as a 1tb ssd can be quite expensive
Nope. You can get them less than $150 now.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 19 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: May 5, 2019 @ 1:28am
Posts: 19