安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Ark is much the opposite, designed much more favorably around pve and single player play.
And then there's Atlas, which is something in between Ark and Rust.
On ark you have mutations on dinos, different levels, crafting skill on guns and armor. You have to put in alot of hours into the game and you get stuck with that game. Theres no hour room to go switch game atleast till you are alpha with 1k heavy turrets filled because you will get raided.
On rust on the other hand you can also get offline raided but you haven't put in hundreds of hours to get to that stage to get offlined.
Weekly wipes on rust servers is the way to go. Rust with a bigger wipe cycle would result in "Alpha tribe states" where server dies and a couple of groups who are left have 50+ boxes of topnotch gear.
Play on a server with offline raid protection.
Disagree. Also I don't understand the comparison because they are different games with some similar features like the building, some dissimilar like the breeding and boss arenas, and they offer different experiences from server to server. For example I'd wager the RP community is much larger in Ark than Rust but I have no data to support this. There are parts of Ark where you need people and coordination, but I wouldn't say Ark lends itself more to PVE/SP. It depends how you play the game.
Atlas is bad. Really bad. Which is why it has a smaller player base than 7D2D already.
holy necro batman