Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
And honestly theres nothing wrong with opengl, not sure how you got that idea, just remember back when ark came out UE4's opengl support was absolutely ♥♥♥♥, it was a halfassed afterthought, the shaders didnt even work right....and they're still on that old ass engine version!
Also heres a post about going from OpenGL to Vulkan - https://developer.nvidia.com/transitioning-opengl-vulkan
but there is an extremely low chance that ARK will see a DX12 version. not to talk about a Vulkan-version.
*citation needed
*Applied Common Sense
Optional support for things like ASTC based texture compression would also be nice.
I really wish someone (maybe Mesa) would add a "shader language based compression" extension where conventional compression can be run through a GLSL routine. This could be used to add new features to old drivers, and workarounds for absent texture compression algorithms.
Again though, remember, ark is using a very old build of UE4 so ARK moving to vulkan is non-trivial, it would take months of either backporting ue4 changes into their customized codebase or porting ark's code into a newer build of UE4, neither of which I see happening anytime soon.
From people I talked to updating the engine is easier then backporting!
the used UE4 version is 4.5 so it's pretty old