Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
And honestly theres nothing wrong with opengl, not sure how you got that idea, just remember back when ark came out UE4's opengl support was absolutely ♥♥♥♥, it was a halfassed afterthought, the shaders didnt even work right....and they're still on that old ass engine version!
Also heres a post about going from OpenGL to Vulkan - https://developer.nvidia.com/transitioning-opengl-vulkan
but there is an extremely low chance that ARK will see a DX12 version. not to talk about a Vulkan-version.
*citation needed
*Applied Common Sense
Optional support for things like ASTC based texture compression would also be nice.
I really wish someone (maybe Mesa) would add a "shader language based compression" extension where conventional compression can be run through a GLSL routine. This could be used to add new features to old drivers, and workarounds for absent texture compression algorithms.
Again though, remember, ark is using a very old build of UE4 so ARK moving to vulkan is non-trivial, it would take months of either backporting ue4 changes into their customized codebase or porting ark's code into a newer build of UE4, neither of which I see happening anytime soon.
From people I talked to updating the engine is easier then backporting!
the used UE4 version is 4.5 so it's pretty old