Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
970 is 50% faster than a 1050 ti.
1060 is better, 50 is two teirs lower than 70 in each generation. One generation newer isn't enough to make up for it. Especially since the x50's are the lowest of the gaming gpu's that nvidia makes. They are just for the extreme low budget builds, nothing else.
50 = entry level
60 = entry midrange
70 = mid range / entry high end
80 / Titan = high end
Pretty much how Nvidias cards go, anything ending in a 60 or upwards is usually where you want to start unless on a really tight budget.
I would say it's definatly playable running at 1920x1080 as long as you don't mind dropping shadows/aa to medium and tweeking the other stuff.