Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I am a dino fan, I have been for over 30 years. I could reel off twenty different species of dinosaur or other prehistoric creatures infinitely more unique and interesting than Charcarodontasaurus without even putting any thought into it. I find the continued requests for this distinctly uninteresting and generic large therapod baffling. It wouldn't be so bad but no one requesting it ever makes any suggestions at all about why they think it should actually be added to the game, what unique or interesting thing it could possible do that isn't already being done by one or more creatures already in game or being added. It's always 'Devs you should add this, k thx bai!'
Im happy for more content.
#moreDLC
no, we'd rather smaller, pesky blighters that knock you out insanely quickly or steal your stuff :P
There's no reason to have multiple dinos that have no functional difference between them, unless they're both iconic.
Yea, i really Like those, they Piss every Saltlord off, so they are great