Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I think it is fair enough to say that Trebor is correct that for game balance reasons the yari samurai act as a major counter, alongside foot archers and gunners.
Since this is specifically bow cav we're talking about I doubt I've ever done much of anything with them other than kite, or even more likely never recruited them to begin with.
I have frankly never found a point of putting bow cavalry into an army, in shogun 2 the reasons to do it are not impactful enough because battle themselves are so fast and the first rout you get means you win, which knocks the wind out using any type of skirmishing unit, you might as well have just more melee cavalry or bow infantry.
Bow cavalry are best used in rush melee army's that are also using yari cavalry thats a standard practice in any total, bow cavalry is faster than infantry, so in shogun that's the advantage you get once the enemy cavalry is gone or not present, but as said that not worth much due to battle longevity.
In defensive army's bow cavalry make no sense because they can't work out of your army comp independently(as they can in other tw's) and your gambling if the AI has its own cavalry or not per battle, where now the more bow cavalry you have the more inefficient your army slots are becoming , your better off evading this potential army comp weakness to zero by just not recruiting any bow cavalry and simply having more infantry bow units.
Also the main point of defensive army's is to limit the burden of micro so why the hell put bow cavalry into such an army.
I rather take those upkeep costs and spread them out into my ashigaru stacks to support samurai that actually work better with yari ashigaru and the list is long before I will ever get to bow cavalry, that's also in part due to accessibility of units. Bow cavalry unfortunately in shogun 2 suffer from not adding any real compositional strength in a SP context because of battle speed and their own speed means they need protecting by your melee cavalry incase the AI has its own(the OP found this out). You may just aswell use the upkeep of the bow cavalry and just have another yari cavalry
If you look at warhammer or take Attila missile cavalry bring utility as they are fast and can operate outside of melee infantry without the need of support, now also factor in factions that also have strong melee cavalry like hunnic blow your balls off melee cavalry, missile cavalry is actually giving you such a compositional advantage because even if you manage to beat hunnic melee cavalry you now have to contend with the hunnic missile cavalry which render your own melee cavalry useless, the quantity of missile cavalry can be very small and still remain very impactful to your army, in shogun 2 this doesn't really exist, 2-4 units of bow cavalry will do jack to make yoru army more tougher. Of course if you make 19 stack and fight the AI with all infantry or barely any cavalry, or they bug out then yeah it can work.
Shogun 2 unfortunately didnt know how to handle missile cavalry at the time in subsequent total wars you start seeing speed variations of cavalry to create some better balancing and battle longevity get longer making skirmishing more decisive(in SP anyway).