Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also showed CA that you can release a game full of bugs. It will still sell a lot...
DLC in shogun actually gives new units that change the way you play the game. Rome 2 DLC were just copying some units from other factions into a new faction and you got a DLC... They released some new campaign DLC´s to try and make up for that or to train new developers. New developers working with old technology to gain experience to release Thrones with the old 32bit engine... a joke...
One thing they absolutely got right in this game and in part, imo, makes up for the more competitive AI in this game compared to other TW games.
Bugs galore, unbalanced formations, ai that doesn't know how to use half the games features. DLC whoring. Many things left unfixed years later. The audience for these games is just used to accepting half assed features and programming.
CA is the strategy equivalent to bethesda.
Why are you finding ways to defend it? Its not justifiable. Why settle for worse when CA used to do us better?
9 identical factions in a game where faction diversity was going to be small anyway?
This game vanilla has possibly the worst replay value of all Total War titles. Its essentially 'start somewhere else'. There are barely any different units for each of them.
The game being chopped up into peices and sold back to us is textbook microtransactions. You are essentially paying for something that is already in the game, and its happened enough at this point that idiots have settled with it.
Why arent these factions already in the game!? DLC campaigns are an excuse because it is content clearly separated from the base game, (an actual expansion) and content that did not deliver with the game in the first place.
Next to CA, fans of the series are to blame for letting this slip past and into future games to come. Weeaboos were so satisfied by watching glitchy samurai NPCs teleport to fight eachother that they forgot they paid for half a game, and that is what we have been given ever since. Warhammer the worst of which. The amount of DLC for those games is putrid.
Medieval 2 and Rome gave you every faction on release, and then entirely different DLC expansion campaigns on the side. No microtransactions.
I dont even know if it did. Empire has microtransactions, but im pretty sure you got every faction out of the gate at least.
Did you actually read what he wrote or are you just so salty?
No they did not. Look at what they 'added' in Remastered; 'made all factions playable'.
If you wish to dislike something, go for it, but at least be factual instead of just being salty.
Which ones? I'm asking coz I don't believe it. Or do you mean the Mongols and Timurids?
Those, plus Papal States and the Aztecs (in base campaign at least).