How is everyone's pc performance?

[Quinners]

Like the title says, even with a decent pc I get crap performance no matter the settings. Ultra in everything gives me about 5-10 less fps than lowest in all settings. I've heard other people are still having issues with 980/Titan X so I wanted to see how everyone else was getting along.

With an i7 2600k and a GTX690 I'm getting 35-40fps on max @ 1440p and 40-50fps on basically anything high/medium/low. Luckily I'm running G-sync so it isn't as jarring as the dark ages before G-sync, but still.

How is everyone else's pc dealing with it?

edit:

Important system specs
i7 2600k
32gb DDR3
Windows 7 Ultimare 64bit
ASUS GTX690 4gb

[ZueX]

I'm running I5 4670k and gtx970. It isn't running all that great. Seems to hover around 50-60fps. I definitely thought it would run better.

[A Regular Italian Plumber]

Considering in totalbiscuits video he was getting sub 60 with 2 980s in SLI and there are posts from others saying it runs like crap. Im going to assume poorly for everyone. You'd think they would have fixed it up a bit for release but this may end up like the new Carmageddon and run like trash for everyone.

[rouven.og]

max settings ~25-30 FPS with 780 ti in 1080p
My workaround is: Disable shadows.

I get a huge FPS boost and it doesn't looks so bad.
Sure, with shadows on it looks cooler, darker and more realistic... But I can deal with this "tweak"...
I think we have to wait for a patch .... if we get one..

[Quinners]

Originally posted by ZueX:

I'm running I5 4670k and gtx970. It isn't running all that great. Seems to hover around 50-60fps. I definitely thought it would run better.

Yeah I'd heard horror stories. I partially blame the UE4 though, which it can be impressive, it currently runs like ♥♥♥♥ in every game that uses it. Hatred does have some great effects though so with time and optimization (hopefully) it'll even out.

[Steak Bake]

i7 3770k GTX 980 everything on ultra except shadows getting 58-62fps @ 1080p

[Drizzle]

Originally posted by Wally the Weetabix:

i7 3770k GTX 980 everything on ultra except shadows getting 58-62fps @ 1080p

Same for me.

[Natas]

Same as everyone else. Much lower fps compared to all the other games in my inventory. Needs optimization.

[r1k1]

terrible framerate and 99% gpu load. It's true i don't have a really good processor but... what a money waste...

[Jäger]

♥♥♥♥, that's disappointing.
How well/bad do you think it will run on R9 280x+i5-4570k?

[Spets]

I get big fps spikes. where the game locks itself for 5-15 seconds in heavy dense areas and refuses to run. I am running a decently powerful pc though.

[Natas]

Originally posted by Frank Jaeger:

♥♥♥♥, that's disappointing.
How well/bad do you think it will run on R9 280x+i5-4570k?

I'd be interested in hearing from some ATI owners. I wonder if they are having the same low framerate issue.

[r1k1]

this game probably doesnt' even use DirectX11 or something, it runs really bad... was kinda expected except the tutorial stage which i get 60 frames in those 3 rooms... lol

[pleclair]

Smooth here on a phenom II x4 965 gtx 580 1.5gb and 8gb ram. Most settings on ultra, a few high, and med AA. Got choppy (well, probably in the 20-30fps range) was still playable tho, once in the mission. Otherwise, everything, including destruction is smooth. Blows my expectations for my PC.

[r1k1]

i mean i can run arround and shoot people at 30-35fps, it's just not it...

[pleclair]

Originally posted by Needs_To_Sleep:

Originally posted by Frank Jaeger:

♥♥♥♥, that's disappointing.
How well/bad do you think it will run on R9 280x+i5-4570k?

I'd be interested in hearing from some ATI owners. I wonder if they are having the same low framerate issue.

Those buying AMDs knows that these cards underperform in most games... tho who still think its a good buy must realize its not often the case. I've ditched ATi a good number of years ago, and I would never go back. ♥♥♥♥♥♥ drivers, updated twice a years...

Go green and never look back.