Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Anything above 3mil SM goes for the Iron Keep bridge. I usually hang out there with my 80mil chick, it's a quite decent activity, but you'll probably match up quite often with the same people.
From what ive read and experienced myself, infusing the watchers gs with magic actually lowers the damage overall. It destroys the scaling or something similar. Id leave it as is.
For the defenders gs i dont know if it suffers from the same issue.
What i meant is that the watchers gs is an exception to that rule, because something f*cks up when you infuse it.
Because you use a build made for being used this way. What could also be the case is that, testing depending on the build used, it might have a different result and efficiency. Maybe going pure physical is more efficient then going only for the magic damage.
The MLGS gets slighty better in AR when magic infused at ~40 int or higher. But not much better, only a few AR even at 99 int.
A magic infused watcher GS beats an uninfused one by only 8 AR at 99 int. Hardly worth the sacrifice in physical AR for.
The str/dex scaling is unfortunately low on it, so there isn't really any reason to go higher than the min requirements. Its kind of a niche weapon. Unlike the defender GS that can really benifit from a str/fth set-up.
I've heard of people infusing it with a magic stone to get pure physical out of it, but I have never tried it. Looks ok on paper.
no, i used base stats for it. I saw that the scaling was really low so I didn't bother checking how it behaved and high str/dex