Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
To answer your questions:
1: No, it's a cheat
2: Probably
3: I'd say so. What you described is pretty much a slower, less accurate aimbot.
Before I did the math, I learned it this way:
(100, 66) is the whole screen
(100, 79) is half of the screen
one degree is this long.
Then, what will give me 1/4, what will give me 1/8?
I basically made a table by trying every possible angle.
Is this still cheating?
Sure, I can make an amnbot out of this by measuring pixels using a program and refining my formula.
But I didn't. I am still eyeballing the distance to approxmate.
For this game, how do you define cheating and skill?
Ask neuro-scientist or your PE teacher
I assume the whole map is 1. So, if your enemy is half of a map away from you, you can plug 0.5 into my formula and you'll likely get a 79.
How do you find an arc in the span of 20 seconds in the first round? Tracer?
Just like in any other sport or game, you need a feeling for the game.
Basketball/Football/CSGO/Dota
And of course new players are going to be noob