Is the game worth it?

[Fritz125]

Just wondering if the game is worth buying right now or if i should spend my money on something else.

[Jack_Staynes]

I've racked up a couple of hundred hours on it already so from my point of view it's beem more than worth it. Depends what you are after really.

[Hurricane]

i hate it when people say theyve racked up 100s of hours so all is good...

go look at my steam and see all my games.

if this game was worth it id say it was and its not its tedius and boring due to map ai being worse than rome 2 and the ai cant work out how to use the horde feature so you steam roll them even on the hardest settings.

avoid until 75% off

[=(e)= Lemonater47]

引用自 Hurricane：

i hate it when people say theyve racked up 100s of hours so all is good...

go look at my steam and see all my games.

if this game was worth it id say it was and its not its tedius and boring due to map ai being worse than rome 2 and the ai cant work out how to use the horde feature so you steam roll them even on the hardest settings.

avoid until 75% off

To be fair you just have nothing nice to say about anything.

[Spice must flow]

引用自 Mephiston87：

I prefer the campaign AI in the earlier games its far superior, people become your enemy for a reason and they attack you with proper forces hitting your weakspots etc or become friends because its profitable. But the battle AI in the newer games does seem better.

But the main thing in M2 every army playes very differently, in Attila every army plays basically the same.

And cavalry isnt stupidly OP.

Cool story, bro. There is NO diplomacy in Medieval II. You encounter a faction, you smash it's face. That's it. Any attemps at diplomacy are useless. Military alliances do nothing. Your, so called, "allies" march through your territory, looking for weakest citites. You are forced to attack them, but then you get diplomatic penalty, because it was you, who broke the alliance.
I don't buy this "superior AI" stuff. AI in Medieval 2 is an imbecile, who will randomly declare war on you and refuse to surrender, even if he is outnumbered 100 to 1.

[gnorf73]

引用自 Hurricane：

not worth it but youll always get them morons above paying for trash. dont get me wrong i love tw games but the past few years have been trash...

I bought the game and have been loving it. Pretty sure that doesn't make me a moron just because you're one of those little ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ that just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about everything.

[=(e)= Lemonater47]

引用自 Spice must flow：

引用自 Mephiston87：

I prefer the campaign AI in the earlier games its far superior, people become your enemy for a reason and they attack you with proper forces hitting your weakspots etc or become friends because its profitable. But the battle AI in the newer games does seem better.

But the main thing in M2 every army playes very differently, in Attila every army plays basically the same.

And cavalry isnt stupidly OP.

Cool story, bro. There is NO diplomacy in Medieval II. You encounter a faction, you smash it's face. That's it. Any attemps at diplomacy are useless. Military alliances do nothing. Your, so called, "allies" march through your territory, looking for weakest citites. You are forced to attack them, but then you get diplomatic penalty, because it was you, who broke the alliance.
I don't buy this "superior AI" stuff. AI in Medieval 2 is an imbecile, who will randomly declare war on you and refuse to surrender, even if he is outnumbered 100 to 1.

People don't remember the previous games lol.

[Cullen's Hound]

That is the problem with developers supporting mods, if they didn't always play the mod they would realize what an improvement the base games have undergone.

[Straybow]

引用自 Cullen's Hound：

That is the problem with developers supporting mods, if they didn't always play the mod they would realize what an improvement the base games have undergone.

True to a degree, Havent played Rome 1 vanilla for years but I have played and continue to play Europa barbarorum and Roma Surrect um, makes it hard to remember vanilla.

[X-the Unknown]

MTW I is a better game if that tells you anything. ;)

[smidlee]

引用自 =(e)= Lemonater47：

引用自 Spice must flow：

Cool story, bro. There is NO diplomacy in Medieval II. You encounter a faction, you smash it's face. That's it. Any attemps at diplomacy are useless. Military alliances do nothing. Your, so called, "allies" march through your territory, looking for weakest citites. You are forced to attack them, but then you get diplomatic penalty, because it was you, who broke the alliance.
I don't buy this "superior AI" stuff. AI in Medieval 2 is an imbecile, who will randomly declare war on you and refuse to surrender, even if he is outnumbered 100 to 1.

People don't remember the previous games lol.

I'm pretty sure he's remembering a Medieval 2 mod and not the based game. The AI had a lot of trouble handling the new stratgetic map in both Rome and Medieval 2.

[Ty'Quantavius LeDarius]

I'd say even though the dlc are expensive and stupid - with mods like radious, they flesh out a lot of the rosters and even the DLC rosters. So it is kinda worth it.

[Guess5050]

It's better than Rome 2. If you had to choose between Rome 2/Attila then, unless you're fanatic about Rome 2's period, I recommend Attila without a doubt if you have a good computer.