Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No matter what you do the sassanids will always be in a good position to fight the ERE. That's how it was during the actual fall of rome.
Good luck!
The Sassanids never had their entire military destroyed and half their territory conquered by the ERE.
He has cataphracts, I don't. Because I have to invest money in my economy whereas the AI gets free ♥♥♥♥.
No because their armies are about to take the Ghassanids and spill into syria sacking all my cities and ruining my economy. Then we have another ahistorical and dumb invasion of egypt by a vassal state. So I have four fronts atm. If I go and try to steamroller his territory (which will be guarded by even more armies BTW) then he'll just destablisise my economy and beat me by sacking all of my provinces.
On my current Sassanid campaign I'm making 80k from puppet states and about 20~30k from trade agreement with them, my own tax is irrelevant.
After the initial 10 turns of civic development I don't think I ever clicked "End turn" with less than 35k income, not to mention not only the AI doesn't have to deal with legendary dif upkeep, they often pay less than human players, I'd expect them to be able to start the game with enough money to support at least 20 armies. Try a mod to remove the limit to see what happens.
The only weird thing about Sassanid AI is why they use some spear levies when they could make 100% elite armies instead.
http://cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/537390073862280330/5F5841219B95B15A53E16FD25677565F4BD12AEA/
This is not legendary. I play to enjoy myself not for a challange.
That is broken. If the AI has the ability to train 10 full elite armies then I should have ten full elite armies. I will only come back to this game once modders deal with this stupid free money system. I spent HOURS getting my economy to work and to stop rebellions. You are telling me that the AI can just spam armies and suffers no negatives at all? Noi, thats not fair and thats a waste of my time. Armies which he then uses to undo HOURS of work on my settlements. This is after I ve just absoplutely massacred 6 of his armies? No. Not having it. I am the larger faction and I could not have survived a blow like that.
And no, you shouldn't, this is a game about the fall of rome, if you play rome expect a challenge at any difficutly level, that's as absurd as saying if rome can field 3 elite armies the one province minor barbarias should start by doing the same, they shouldn't they don't start with the same position, same technology, hell they don't even have elite units at the beggining, if they had 2k income from their only province that would be great.
I won that war. A war I had no interest in fighting and the AI just spammed crap out of its arse with free money.Now they're gonna start sacking my provinces and starting rebellions all over the place and food shortages.
I spent hours trying to keep the fighting on their territory in order to stop them doing that but the AI keeps sending his armies around mine to try and do just that.
It's your own fault, if you can't take an enemy, don't fight that enemy, this is a strategy game not a "spambot" game, if you didn't give them tons of cash or made a buffer zone between you and them that's also your fault, if you want the AI to just sit patiently forever with negative relations knowing they are more powerful, more wealthy than you then you're playing the wrong genre entirely.
There's a reason why I didn't play the ERE as my first campaign, I knew it wouldn't be a cakewalk. If anything this is good game design which makes sure every nation is a unique experience with varying degrees if difficulty.
Want it easy? Go Sassanid, want an average dif campaign? Take the barbarians, want it hard? Get the Romans, just don't complain about your own choices.
I had the buffer zone at Nisbeais and Arbela/ They just ignored it after a while and went around it.
No I was more powerful than the Sassanids even before they lost half their empire.
Take him? I've won every battle and killed thousands of them. On an old TW game that counted for something. In this game it means nothing because free monies.