Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Attila visually, looks quite a lot better than Rome 2, including better textures, and little things like sun glare off metal surfaces. All of the graphic improvements combined makes the game quite beautiful. Attila is also much more atmospheric and adds almost a storylike feeling when playing a faction as you have to not only satisfy your goals of conquest, but fend off the hordes of Huns, and the ever increasing effects of climate change. It is important to note, however, that this is a new game and will perform much worse than Rome will, on any computer.
In terms of money, Rome 2 is much better value, as it is 75% off, which means you can get the game with all dlc really cheap, and you will have 5 campaigns and over 30 factions to choose from in grand campaign. Like I said, these have a huge range in culture with very different units and rosters going across Europe.
For pretty much the same price, you can get Attila without any DLC which only has one campaign and about 12 factions to play on it, note that most of these factions only really fall into 5 categories, Romans, Huns, Germans, Normadic Germans and the Eastern Sassannids. each category will pretty much have the same units, with a few unique units in each faction.
I would personally reccommend Rome 2 at the moment, especially is finance is in consideration as it is 75% off, but don't get me wrong, Attila is a very good game, but by the time you've had some fun with everything Rome has to offer, Attila will be cheap on a sale, and you can get that too, where it will be in a better state, and have more DLC and general content in the game.
I hope this helped!
Both games are the same if you want to be simplistic. Both games are very different if you want to talk about both game mechanics (politics, hordes, climate change in Attilla), and the campaigns in Attilla are a notch more interesting and dynamic because of said Attilla and climate change and politics.
If you have neither game, Rome 2 is easier and has a greater variety of nations (by Attilla much of the world is "Romanized" and there are fewer glaring cultural differences...but they are still there). If you have Rome 2 and enjoyed it, and like this period in time (Rome fighting to survive, Attilla grinding everything into the dust, and everyone else just trying to pick up the pieces), then Attilla is a good buy.
For example, the new generals system; where every army MUST have a general, the new province system; where multiple towns form together to make a province and each town in one province share abilities and bonuses from each town.
An example of this is if you have a miliraty building in one of your towns, you will be able to recruit the units available to that building in any territory in that province, not just the town you built it in.
In general, Rome 2 and Attila are very different to Empire, but of course, they are still Total War games, and a lot of it is very similar.
I really enjoy both Rome 2 and Attila, though the campaigns in Attila play a lot differently than in Rome since Attilla not only is really difficult to get rid of, but because until he dies for good, you will be facing stacks after stacks of fear-causing troops that will ruin your week. Not to mention, climate change during Attilla means you will end up dealing with starvation and being forced to create a lot more food buildings than you would otherwise. You'll also want to make food buildings that are less dependant on soil fertility because the soil becomes barren on over half the map.
But, I think the most fun and challendge I've had in Total War games has been in the fall of the western empire scenario...just as fun as it was in Rome:Barbarian Invasion, but much harder.
I really really liked Napoleon Total War and Fall of the Samurai is an awesome standalone Add-On with Gatling Guns, Parrot and Armstrong Guns, Marines, heavy Warships and more stuff. You should definitely try this one
This is the better Shogun http://store.steampowered.com/app/345240/
Get over it already. I'm sure you're also excited for Total War-Hammer as well I bet.
"campaign map and political situation"
Um, Paradox also do these things and does it much better too. Total War is really about the battles.
Heh...I remember playing Shogun 1. The only thing that Shogun 1 was better at were the cool assasination videos. I miss those dearly. The combat on the other hand was horrible...units would stay in long rectangles, nagitana troops were in terminator armor, sieges were a mess because units wouldn't conform to the organic shapes of castles, etc.
But when you saw a Geisha start strolling toward your general...uh uh.
Yeah the video cutscenes were the best, I love the ending especially too. The combat was revolutionary at the time! LOL there's definitely something about hundreds of sprites doing battle that I find adorable.