Age of Charlemagne Campaign or Grand Campaign?

[𝕄ℝ ℕ𝕆𝔹𝕆𝔻𝕐]

Both are really fun, but one is the best. Give your humble opinion

[easytarget]

Apparently the two choices you offered up bored everyone so much they couldn't be bothered to respond.

Which come to think of it feels entirely like an appropriate response.

[TargetSlayer]

I have enjoyed campaigns in both. The Grand Campaign provides much more freedom to explore the mechanics of Attila than Charlemagne. If I were new to Attila, I would start there with an easy faction like the Sassanids. Charlemagne's campaigns are more focused and feel more scripted, which creates for more of a unique story to each faction than the Grand Campaign. They remind me of the DLCs for Medieval II in some ways.

Having been entertained by all the Total War titles since Rome 2, including the Warhammer series, I feel Attila is their most sophisticated strategy title in the series. The artwork is very well done. The interaction of villagers is very nice. There are several mechanics the player needs to work. And the AI is very agressive compared to many of the other titles.

Being a player who prefers to slowly build/tech up, it took me some time to like Attila's more "total war" playstyle. But there's a lot more here for the strategy gamer than other Total War titles.

Best

[𝕄ℝ ℕ𝕆𝔹𝕆𝔻𝕐]

I love all Total War Sagas, Can't Disagree or Agree with one or other. But in my opinion, Attila is not a bad game, skipping the mods the Game alone is such fun, but with the certains mods will make it better. Yes, Rome 2 have a lot of glitches just like Attila. But Both Are really the same