Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You're being sarcastic right?
You're actually being serious? The ones you think of are fiction, made up around the 19th centuary for theatres operas and soforth.
They did wear Bearskin. Hence the name ''Bearshirts'' or ''Berserker'' in ancient norse.
They did not accompany raiding parties, they stayed with their master and fought for them to settle disputes. And could be used to bully peasants of their land.
There was no substances that would make a man high and wild available to the vikings. And they did not use any such things.
There are no accounts of people going berserk. And if there are descriptions of people going wild in combat ''berserk'' or ''berserker'' wasnt used to describe it. Berserker simply means bearshirt and what you think of is just made up pop-culture
Here ya go, first link I found. http://www.historyextra.com/article/feature/viking-berserkers-facts-really-exist
That article is absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. A Swedish 5th centuary Phalanx?! Thats just hilarious.
A random article on the internet is not evidence of the existence of berserkers. It claims that these men supposedly were invurnable to pain and fearless. That is just propaganda, all men feel pain. I am Swedish so you could imagine I would like it very much if Sweden had theese cool ''berserker'' warriors long ago. But it is only storys and tales. The person that wrote this article can not tell the difference betwen recorded historic fact and written down legends and stories.
This article just repeats the pop-culture assumptions of what berserkers were.
Watch this video it gives a great summery of what berserkers were: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBUGQkpk3RE
If you can refute the article, go for it, and give quotes and specifics.
Scandinavia was Catholic in the middle ages [year 1000 and up] So how come there was supposedly ''berserkers'' devoted to Odin fighting for Sweden in the middle ages?
You are likely right that they wore bear-skins, but I think that wolf skins were probably worn as well based on Owedevil's post. The important thing is that they wore animal skins, and CA amazingly got that right (woohoo.)
Based off the Viking sagas, berserkers actually did go "berserk". I do not know if they were actually high on something, but in many books I read it said they chewed on toadstools. I dont have enough knowlegde of fungi to tell if any that caused effects like this grew in Northern Europe. (Feel free to look that up.)
Even if these toadstools or other halluciogenic substances were not available to the Vikings in Northern Europe, they likely could have gotten them throught their extensive trade connections.
In many of the Viking sagas they are described as taking part in raids and cutting through enemy armies, and were referred to by Christians as "heathen devils", a reputation I think they would have had a hard time obtaining if they spent all their time fighting Norwegian peaseants in single combat.
The wolf skin on the berserkers in Rome I was the least historically inaccurate thing about them.
Be glad that CA didn't make the berserkers in charlemange hulking, bare chested supermen with the ability to hurl opponents into the air and take down elephants with ease, destroying entire armies in seconds. (believe me, I know how ridiculous they were. I played Rome I for several years)