Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The downside (depending on how you look at it) is that you can get succession wars, where another faction has claim to your lands, which in turn can either cause your faction to disappear more or less instantaneously, or a civil war within your faction.
That's probably why CA removed it, because most casual tw players would find it confusing or irritating.
The ai can have trouble handling it amongst itself too, similar to how region trading was.
I hope they refine it and bring it back for the next, historically based game though.
Why cant the re-ta-rds stick to CoD or Battlefield and let actual people play actual games without them being dumbed down to crappery.
You're probably correct though. It was probably a move to target the market of dirty-casuals.
This is true and a good tactic but with the complete lack of diplomatic depth to the game, it's purely a shallow action. Youre probably just as well declaring war on them and taking their lands.
Literally no use to allies in Total War imho