Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If the Jedi wanted to strengthen Juhani they would have told her Quatra was dead either way. Force her to sink or swim under the weight of her own actions and reward her with the knowledge after the quest was over, when/if she had overcome her past.
now that said. i completely agree that if my theory were true that they should have handled it as you said Ragnarök.
it's just that sometimes the council makes the wrong choice. like when they wanted to take away meetra suriks force and doom the galaxy. or all the dumb stuff atris does.
If you're looking at the Jedi council you have to recognise that what they were during the Jedi Civil War was vastly different from what they became during the Sith Civil War.
For starters, Vrook only became a villian when he was written that way in K2. During K1, he was one of the two masters who were rightly skeptical of giving you access to the things that made Revan fall in the first place. He didn't think it was worth the trade if you flip-flopped back to your old ways because as bad as Malak was, at least with him at the helm the war ground to a standstill. Even once Obsidian had changed his characteristics, there was still nothing inherently unreasonable about his cynisism toward you in K1. Revan wasn't there by choice, but they needed the knowledge he had to end the war, so lying was justified.
It's also important to remember that all but a few special cases become wards of the jedi order at a very young age. there isn't much of a choice for them. the order actively seeks out force sensatives and absorbs them into thier cult-like organization.
idk vrooks a ♥♥♥♥ he's very negative and overly critical. granted psychologicly that probably reflects how he is on himself and ultimetly he is doing it out of his own concept of the greater good. but still he's a douche.
lieing to revan was necessary. you could argue that it's justified. but you could also argue that it's comparable to what malak does to bastila. both are done for they're respective greater goods.
You're right. Vrook doesn't like Revan. Probably because Revan killed or otherwise destroyed many a person Vrook cared about. Whatever Revan's personal value and potential if redeemed, as far as Vrook is concerned, when placed on a scale Revan would still be worth less than what was taken from him. I don't blame him.
The sticking point with Revan was that he was responsible for the war. That's what justified using him to end it. That's his atonement which was preferable since imprisonment or execution are the alternatives. Bastila was just a soldier.
It may be the stuff of fanfic, but I think it would have been fun if they opted not to do the amnesia thing in KotOR, and just had Revan remain an evil bastard held prisoner by Bastila. Could have been fun to see her try and redeem him, making progress bit by bit or to try and corrupt her yourself. Could have still ended the same way really.
still it's Vrooks lack of compassion that bothers me. i can understand where he is comming from but i expect more out of a council member. i want to say he's even the head of the council but i may be mistaken. i'll google it later
taking only Kotor into account and excluding the rest of the TOR universe... then yes revan is completely to blame for the war. regardless noone would know otherwise anyway in kotor.
the amnesia stuff is good story even if it's a bit farfetch it makes a good twist. would have been interesting if bastilla was the main character. both could be character created players, male plays revan female plays bastilla. i think that the reason they went the route they did was for the pure rpg element. you can create any character you want and it fits into the story. they were still developing the game system back then also.
I do however have a question for you to maybe think about as i'am thinking about right now if the Jedi council were so desperate to recrut Revan to make their numbers bigger then why would they send Juhani on a mission that might-of got her killed I mean come on use your logic people doesn't the Jedi council know Revan might need all the help he she or they can get defeating Maleck I what are they thinking Maleck is somewhat tuff to beat?
It's meta knowledge, but the game is telling the player that the Jedi believed there was something in Juhani that could lead to her redemption. Which means they also believe she fell to the darkside or else there could be no redemption.