Primal Carnage: Extinction

Primal Carnage: Extinction

Ten wątek został zamknięty
BananaJesus 22 kwietnia 2015 o 11:57
Tyrannosaurs Rex vs. Spinosaurs who would win
Before anyone asks, this is not a vote match of whose the best, or I dont want to get into an argumanet I am just showing based on all scientific evidence who would win in a fight between Trex and Spino.

Many people believe that in a fight spino could destroy a trex in a fight whether it be on land or water. Well sorry that is false despite what others have told you im here to clear things out and set things straight.

Alright now before we get to the fighting lets get to the size weight prey and so on of these 2 competitors.


Trex (king of the dinos)


Length: 12-13m long
Height 6 m tall
Weight 7-8 tonnes
prey: Hadrosaurs, tricerotops, ankylosaurs, etc
home: North America

Spino (sail lizard)

Length 15-16m long
Height: 7m at the sail
Weight: 9-10 tonnes
prey: large fish
home: Africa


Latest Evidence on Spino

New evidence from new fossils show that spino could not walk on 2 legs as previously thought and it was not like any other predatory dinosaur. From this new specimen the reaserchers and paleontologists could only conclude that spino was adapting to a life in the water rather than on land. All of its weird features such as the short legs, long sail, and crocodile like head were all adapted for catching slippery fish vs hunting dinos like some had previously thought.

Compared to Trex , Spino was longer but in height if it stood on 2 legs it was about the same height. However the teeth of these 2 dinos suggest very different lifestyles whereby Trex was designed to breal impenetrable defenses of its prey (ankylos and cerotopsians) while spinos were designed to grab and hold fish.

In addition Trex was much smarter than Spino for it had a bigger brain. It also had binocular vision which made it have much better sense of vision then spino did. Finally Trex had a bite 6x more powerfull than spinos being able to possibly produce a bite of 70,000 pounds.

Now before people say well what about jp3 or monsters ressureced well those were accutate but of the old spinosaurs.

For clarrification when Trex bit the spinos neck the fight should have been over as the rex had a fim bite and was using all of its jaw power. However Jack Horner wanted to get rid of the rex so he instead made the spino meraculasly excape the rexes clutches and turn the tables resulting in the rexes death.

Now in Monsters ressurected they used baryonx as a model to make Spino. This proved inaccurate as from the results in comparison with the new specimen Spino was 10 feet to long, his arms and claws were half that size, and his overall look was nothing like it was in that documentary.

Alright now from all this evidence above many of you might be thinking that im pro -rex well im not im just sick and tired of people thinking that spino was the superior predator to rex when they werent even made to hunt the same animals.


Now if Spino and rex were to fight who would win?

If it was a land battle Trex would destroy the spino but in the water spino would beat the rex.


So from all the evidence its concluded that Trex would win 80% of the time due to its bigger brain better eyesight and stronger bite.


Please watch these videos giving more clarity to what i have said before replying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcudL7t6oDk ( if the game models were to fight)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qETwhuhxcsc ( at the end talks about who would win)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoeA6xaVdZo (Paleontologist talks about spino)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ (what should have happened in jp3)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrannosaurus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinosaurus






Ostatnio edytowany przez: BananaJesus; 16 września 2015 o 13:53
< >
Wyświetlanie 91-105 z 148 komentarzy
VioletChainsaw 18 stycznia 2016 o 6:25 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Pokemastrmorgan:
yeah but whatever everyone knows its true it's just the fanboys cant except it
Pretty sure the fanboys are the ones who like Rex
MysticArcanum 18 stycznia 2016 o 6:50 
jp3 fanboys
VioletChainsaw 18 stycznia 2016 o 12:06 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Pokemastrmorgan:
jp3 fanboys
But note that you did say rex was superior to all prehistoric lifeforms, not just Spino.
MysticArcanum 18 stycznia 2016 o 13:07 
No, i said those jp3 fanboys cant accept that the spino woyld lose
MysticArcanum 18 stycznia 2016 o 13:07 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Pokemastrmorgan:
No, i said those jp3 fanboys cant accept that the spino would lose
VioletChainsaw 18 stycznia 2016 o 18:52 
Początkowo opublikowane przez kingj0n:
Besides, T-Rex was superior to all them creatures back then....
No you didn't.
Trex could have been beaten by ankylosaurus, titanosaurs, but tarbosaurus and tricerotops 50/50
Rotiart 19 stycznia 2016 o 15:23 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Lord Max:
Trex could have been beaten by ankylosaurus, titanosaurs, but tarbosaurus and tricerotops 50/50
1 Nope
2 Didn't Hunt Titanosaurs
3 Nope
4 Nada
VioletChainsaw 19 stycznia 2016 o 15:44 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Rotiart:
Początkowo opublikowane przez Lord Max:
Trex could have been beaten by ankylosaurus, titanosaurs, but tarbosaurus and tricerotops 50/50
1 Nope
2 Didn't Hunt Titanosaurs
3 Nope
4 Nada
I don't see why it couldn't be beaten by Ankylosaurus. Rex hunted Alamosaurus, which was a titanosaur. Tarbosaurus is the only wrong thing here, never woulda happened. Triceratops would probably be able to take on a rex mmmkaayy.
Rotiart 19 stycznia 2016 o 15:55 
Początkowo opublikowane przez AcidicHeresy:
Początkowo opublikowane przez Rotiart:
1 Nope
2 Didn't Hunt Titanosaurs
3 Nope
4 Nada
I don't see why it couldn't be beaten by Ankylosaurus. Rex hunted Alamosaurus, which was a titanosaur. Tarbosaurus is the only wrong thing here, never woulda happened. Triceratops would probably be able to take on a rex mmmkaayy.
Alamosaurus didn't live in Hell Creek
It could flip an Ankylosaurus, or wait until one flips on it's own accord down a slope or something
Tarbosaurus is basically a small T.Rex
Triceratops was Tyrannosaurus' main food source, aside from weak hadrosaurs.
MysticArcanum 19 stycznia 2016 o 17:51 
Ok final comment neither wins because they lived in completely different places
Rotiart 19 stycznia 2016 o 17:56 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Pokemastrmorgan:
Ok final comment neither wins because they lived in completely different places
Nope
VioletChainsaw 20 stycznia 2016 o 6:27 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Rotiart:
Początkowo opublikowane przez AcidicHeresy:
I don't see why it couldn't be beaten by Ankylosaurus. Rex hunted Alamosaurus, which was a titanosaur. Tarbosaurus is the only wrong thing here, never woulda happened. Triceratops would probably be able to take on a rex mmmkaayy.
Alamosaurus didn't live in Hell Creek
It could flip an Ankylosaurus, or wait until one flips on it's own accord down a slope or something
Tarbosaurus is basically a small T.Rex
Triceratops was Tyrannosaurus' main food source, aside from weak hadrosaurs.
Tyrannosaurus was very widespread, and did live in the same time and place as Alamosaurus.
Flipping a giant animal is way harder than you seem to think it is.
Tarbosaurus doesn't live in the same area anyways so woulda never happened.
50/50 is very applicable to this situation.

Rex isn't an invincible death monster, it could and did get killed by it's own prey.
We do know that trex got in fights with tricerotops as we have found trexes and tricerotopses with injuries corrosponding to one another (although this could be from scavenged carcasses) and one trex with a smashed shin on a trex probably caused by ankylosaurus. I think that trex just wouldent have fuc.ked with ankylosaurus, It has a wide body that would have been hard to grip onto or even just bite. It had tough armor and was pretty low set, so trex would have to make itself slightly vulnerable to get a hold of it. It also has a bigass tail just at the level of trexes shins, if it hits the trex the trex is dead. Its bones will break and it will A) fall and break its neck B) starve or C) get eaten alive by dromeosaurs (possibly). The trex could not flip a four ton dinosaur its neck was not strong enough to lift its huge neck, head, and body, plus four tons, and couldn't get a good grip on it, and would get its head smashed in. To me ankylosaurus seems to have evolved to be trex proof. If it was a complete pushover it would have gone extinct extremely quickly, it did not live in herds, it was slow, and all it had going for it was a good sense of smell. Anyway 90/10 towards anktank. I am still going with my theory that trex would not have challenged powerful herbivores to mortal combat like a dumbass, it would have A) used its smell to find a corpse, chase other predators off the kill, and crack bones with its powerful jaws or B) if it could not find a corpse it would have ambushed hadrosaurs and stuffs. It would have attacked ceratopsians and such if it was starving. I am not arguing this point again, look at spinosaurus vs trex and hate mail me there. Tarbosaurus was not a small trex, it was a slightly slimmer trex. I know the trex had a four foot tall skull, but it could only open its mouth half that much, think about it its skull is not all teeth it has a brain and gums and ♥♥♥♥, and the ankylosaurus was a huge cylinder, I do not think it could have gotten a bite of it. I did not say the trex would have fought all of these things they would have lived in the same time period. Also dont come up with comments where you just talk about how stupid I am without talking about anything paleontological, just fight me.
Rotiart 20 stycznia 2016 o 15:58 
Początkowo opublikowane przez AcidicHeresy:
Początkowo opublikowane przez Rotiart:
Alamosaurus didn't live in Hell Creek
It could flip an Ankylosaurus, or wait until one flips on it's own accord down a slope or something
Tarbosaurus is basically a small T.Rex
Triceratops was Tyrannosaurus' main food source, aside from weak hadrosaurs.
Tyrannosaurus was very widespread, and did live in the same time and place as Alamosaurus.
Flipping a giant animal is way harder than you seem to think it is.
Tarbosaurus doesn't live in the same area anyways so woulda never happened.
50/50 is very applicable to this situation.

Rex isn't an invincible death monster, it could and did get killed by it's own prey.
Sherlock
However, no T.Rex would actually hunt a Triceratops from the front, if it got caught it probably just walked away.
The ones that didn't probably died.
Also, you have to account for gravity and the angle of a slope if you want to flip an Ankylosaur.
It wouldn't be all that hard to flip on on a steep enough slope.
< >
Wyświetlanie 91-105 z 148 komentarzy
Na stronę: 1530 50