Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I wouldn't be surprised if Lockheed Martin (P3D) just copied what Dovetail did to fix the VAS issue, as they have done it fairly soon after Dovetail fixed it for FSX:SE. As it is basically the same software , maybe they cooperate on the fixes, which isn't a bad idea.
I have OOM's in FSX SE. If I do some GA flying everything is cool. As soon as I start with PMDG777 from some heavy addon airports like FlyTampa Dubai OOM's start happening. Keep in mind that my sliders are no where near MAX.
I really hope that they will continue to optimize FSX SE. Especially the VAS management and do something similar to what LM has done with the GPU/CPU optimization in V3.
As for P3D, I do like some of the slightly better eye candy, and the cloud shadows etc., but have you seen DCS World 2? The graphics and smoothness of that is supreme. If only we could have a commercial simulator like that, I would be happy, even if it had no previous compatibility at all.
FSX: SE will never be optimised for VAS, 64bit, SLI or anything like that.
Full disclosure, I don't fly P3D. I only use FSX-SE and X-Plane 10 because I don't fall inside the scope of any of LM EULA agreements.
Sure I would love the extra eye candy in P3D, but I have to respect the license agreements. I assume that the majority of the sales for P3D comes from thier Academic license, well at least it's a point of discussion in froogles first impressions video for P3D.
In a way a lot of simmers are substituting that license as a entertainment license. While this is probably not a big deal at the moment, it will be interesting to see how P3D's competetion that actually do have rights to the entertainment license will react if LM can take a big enough share of the simming market. Do you think they will have a reaction if any at all?
Love the videos!
With DX10 and instancing it is unlikely for me to OOM.
As for P3D v3, due to the stupid price, I am more inclined to wait both Dovetails new sim and DCS World 2.
PS. I love the talk about licensing on here and respecting the agreements. The day vendors respect the consumer and don't charge 200 dollars for basically bug fixes that should have been in from the start (P3D v3) , I will consider it also! Ha! Ha!
Wow... haha. Phsyical RAM has *nothing* to do with OOM errors. VAS is Virtual Address Space which is VIRTUAL memory, not PHYSICAL memory. You can have a million GB of RAM in a system and still get OOM errors.
You should read the change log. The very last item states: "The licensing and Digital Rights Management (DRM) system has been completely overhauled."
Thats fine. If you want to trifle with the lawyers at Lockheed Martin, the largest defense contractor in the world, be my guest. I for one will avoid them at all cost and would hate to lose access to a program I spent $60 because I intetionally disregarded their EULA.
Thats exactly how I feel. These guys arent making a game. So their clients, especially the commercial and government ones, have no problem spending big bucks on their updated product. A company that was focused on entertainment consumers would never do that, but they dont care because entertainment consumers arent who they are looking to appeal to.
So! Try not to be entertained whilst using P3D guys!
The Lockheed Martin lawyers might have cameras in you house watching you and you might end up it court! LMAO!