Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Where were you flying from?
At KTEX full mix full throttle on runway static, revs just about reach 2000. After a struggle to get to 9500 feet I lean the mix to 60% and revs are 2100 (50kts and stall warnings).
At KESN full mix full throttle on runway static, revs are just over 2100. After climbing to 500 feet and leaning to 65% revs are just under 2500 (110kts).
The noticeable difference is lift (or lack of it at KTEX)
Edit: spelling
The lesson here is that novice pilots should stay away from KTEX in small aircraft!
The more you uncover the more you see why supposedly there was a team of over 200 people working on FSX. The content within this simulator is kind of mind-blowing at times.
You can plug in a higher barometric pressure into the weather generator to force high-altitude airports to be friendlier to underpowered aircraft. It's like a turbo boost.