Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Their C182 is superb. The Comanche lands hot like the real thing.
Do not waste money only to find out that most 3rd party aircraft are nothing but pretty pictures.
They fly on rails, nothing breaks, boring.
They ride rails.
Carenado is the epitome of a pretty picture and nothing more.
Save your money until you have enough.
Also is JustFlight's Cessna 152 freeware more realistic than Carenado's 152? I already have JustFlight's 152 and I also have a 150L from FrenchVFR and I think I'll just cross off the Carenado 152 from the list.
*Needs to be from the FSX Steam Store
*Has to be a single engine, fixed gear, non-comlplex with fixed-pitch prop
*Must be under $20 (So I can purchase up to 3 aircraft with $50)
A friend of man has the CSA Sport Cruiser and highly suggests me to get it too, saying it's a fantastic airplane to fly and a very fun "low and slow" type of plane. Also, looking at the main discussion of the CSA Sport Cruiser, eveyone says it's a greate airplane to fly. So I'm definitly getting the CSA Sport Cruiser and Long-EZ.
I would even go as far as to say PMDG are sub-par to A2A. That's my personal opinion, but I only enjoy flying GA aircraft. At least PMDG make failures apart of their sim.
That said, you can't go wrong with Carenado or JustFlight, they are great planes and far better than the next lower "tier". I just wouldn't plan on using Carenado for study level, because they're not detailed enough. They'll have switches and fuses that you can't play with, and failures can't occur. Unlike A2A which every little switch and button is actionable, and the plane will age with time and usage.
A2A is designed for you to actually learn something about owning and flying your own plane. "Study Level" some would call it.
If all you can spend is on Steam, then I'd go for either Carenado or JustFlight. I doubt you'll be terribly sorry you did... Unless you buy A2A later in life and realize you should have went that way to begin with.
Thanks for the reply. According to a Carenado Cessna 172N review I saw on YT (the reviewer flew real Cessna 172's before), he said that the 172N's main downsides are the flight dynamics and controls, which he said are too sensitive with not much travel, and the yoke travels more than the control surfaces. He also said he didn't like the panel and avionics of the 172N, but I don't think that's really on Carenado's part as most 172N's have a very basic instrument pack with basic radios. Also there's not autopilot, which isn't a big deal as I love flying the airplane and trimming it just right. :).
I don't mind if Carenado's 172N isn't spot on realistic, I just want a good first payware plane that's better than the default planes. I've flown at the controls (Cessna 172N and SP, and Murphy Rebel) IRL before and I'll decide if Carenado's 172N is good for my minor training usage.
Personally I would recommend buying the Carenado Commander 114 instead. For me it's one of the better Carenado aircraft of that type. It's more versatile, interesting, and unlike their 152 and 172 has autopilot, built-in gps. Also like the other aircraft it also has the full set of radio Nav instruments. The Carenado 152 and 172 are very limited for IFR compared to the stock C172. They are much nicer as hand flying VFR aircraft though.
I have six or seven Carenados and the Commander is a good one that I will use despite having a couple of A2a's.
The freebie Cessna is not that far away (and in some ways better) than the Carenados Cessna's - so I would settle on that and go for the commander to take things to a different level. I don't recommend getting a 152 and 172, as they are just too similar in my opinion.
I would make do with the freebie 152 and await a sale on the A2A 172 if I really wanted one. I think I got my 2 at 40% discount. If you eventually get the A2A 172 you will never fly another 152 or 172 - but you will still get enjoyment out of that Carenado Commander.
For $50.00 you could get AccuFeel which provides a greater imersion level with bumps squeeks, rattles and tweekable handling characteristics, a $19.99 plane of your choice and Rex Soft Clouds.
Heres a couple of pics where all three items are in use.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=920072486
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=775474752
Cheers
Gosh I completely forgot the Rockwell Commander was on Steam. That's a sweet plane and I'm definitly buying that plane when I move to complex aircraft (currently fly strictly single-engine, fixed pitch prop & gear, land plane). I also crossed out the 152 from my list of Steam payware aircraft for FSX since I already have JF's free 152 and FrenchVFR's 150L.
Guess what, you're in luck!!
http://store.steampowered.com/bundle/3593/FSX_Flash_Sale__Carenado__Alabeo/