Sniper Elite or For honor?

[spacelobster]

I wanna buy a game today, but I don't know which one. Thye both seem decent to me

[june]

ghost recon wild lands

[Blackghost]

For Honor . This one will be forgotten in a week.

[RIOT|Stalkermaster]

For honor has terrible server issues, me and my mates were constanly getting kicked mid game, before game and after game for unknown reasons. Its match making sucks but it could still be a good game

[Mentally eel]

if you want a good medieval multiplayer game pick chivalry medieval warfare. Lots of people still playing it, its cheap, and way more realistic and fun. for honor is garbage.

but if i had to pick one i would take sniper elite.

edit :

http://store.steampowered.com/app/219640/

[Blackghost]

Originalmente postado por The Rickest Rick:

if you want a good medieval multiplayer game pick chivalry medieval warfare. Lots of people still playing it, its cheap, and way more realistic and fun. for honor is garbage.

but if i had to pick one i would take sniper elite.

LOL, you don't even own the game.. For Honor is way better than this crap.

[Mentally eel]

Nope i don't. But I had tried it :) and its garbage.

[wolford171]

Neither. I agree with rick. Buy chiv.

[spacelobster]

Originalmente postado por The Rickest Rick:

if you want a good medieval multiplayer game pick chivalry medieval warfare. Lots of people still playing it, its cheap, and way more realistic and fun. for honor is garbage.

but if i had to pick one i would take sniper elite.

edit :

http://store.steampowered.com/app/219640/

I already have it Rick! Wheres morty anyway?

[deathmaster snikch]

This one is a very good SinglePlayer the other one is a very good Multiplayer that sadly has a deadly recipe for failure which are

-Does not have servers on PC it uses Peer to peer
-Has microtransactions even do it cost $60
-Ubisoft
-$60 for a Mp only focused game is a bit pricey
-Denuvo
-Uplay
-High skill cealing with terrible matchmaking is a good recipe to leak players

[EARLY]

Well, since you are asking on the Sniper Elite 4 forum, I'd expect us to say Sniper Elite 4 first, then For Honor. I did play the For Honor beta and it is a good game. But there's no sniping like this in that game :)

[M.Spengler]

For Honor looks not bad, but i think p2p for a competitive multiplayer game is a very bad choice.
I haven`t seen anything in the pre- and reviews that would be worth the price of 60 bucks.

[Selfish Lee Everett]

For Honor is unbalanced at the moment, so if you must get one, get this and wait until Ubisoft fix it like they usually do down the road, see The Division.

[Bio-exorcist]

I thought about this as well, going so far as to pre-order For Honor on amazon but cancelled it. Long story short, there are balance issues (as some here have said), the length of the SP campaign is undetermined, and in the end the gameplay simply didn't win everyone over - some people flat-out hated it. With Sniper Elite, if you own the previous ones, you know what you're getting into and some improvements have been made. It's the safe choice if you like the series.

[Coca Cola Rat]

For Honor looks like its gonna be boring in like a few hours

[Darth_Roxs]

I got For Honor. I'll get Sniper Elite during the summer sale, but the choice is yours. If you want to play a MP game go for For Honor. If you want a single player experience go with SE4.

I brought For Honor on Uplay btw so it won't be in my Steam profile.